March 7, 2024

Defending Against the New Normal in Cybercrime: AI

This blog outlines research & data points on the evolving threat landscape, the impact of malicious AI, and why proactive cyber readiness is essential.

Written by

Max Heinemeyer

Global Field CISO

Inside the SOC

Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.

Written by

Max Heinemeyer

Global Field CISO

Mar 2024

AI in Cyber Security

Over the last 18 months, discussions about artificial intelligence (AI) – specifically generative AI – ranged from excitement and optimism about its transformative potential to fear and uncertainty about the new risks it introduces.

New research¹ commissioned by Darktrace shows that 89 percent of IT security teams polled globally believe AI-augmented cyber threats will have a significant impact on their organization within the next two years, yet 60 percent believe they are currently unprepared to defend against these attacks. Their concerns include increased volume and sophistication of malware that targets known vulnerabilities and increased exposure of sensitive or proprietary information from using generative AI tools.

At Darktrace, we monitor trends across our global customer base to understand how the challenges facing security teams are evolving alongside industry advancements in AI. We’ve observed that AI, automation, and cybercrime-as-a-service have increased the speed, sophistication and efficacy of cyber security attacks.

How AI Impacts Phishing Attempts

Darktrace has observed immediate impacts on phishing, which remains one of the most common forms of attack. In April 2023, Darktrace shared research that found a 135 percent increase in ‘novel social engineering attacks’ in the first two months of 2023, corresponding with the widespread adoption of ChatGPT². These phishing attacks showed a strong linguistic deviation – semantically and syntactically – compared to other phishing emails, which suggested to us that generative AI is providing an avenue for threat actors to craft sophisticated and targeted attacks at speed and scale. A year later, we’ve seen this trend continue. Darktrace customers received approximately 2,867,000 phishing emails in December 2023 alone, a 14 percent increase on what was observed months prior in September³. Between September and December 2023, phishing attacks that used novel social engineering techniques grew by 35 percent on average across the Darktrace customer base⁴.

These observations reinforce trends that others in the industry have shared. For example, Microsoft and OpenAI recently published research on tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) augmented by large language models (LLMs) that they have observed nation-state threat actors using. That includes using LLMs to draft and generate social engineering attacks, inform reconnaissance, assist with vulnerability research and more.

The Rise of Cybercrime-as-as-a-Service

The increasing cyber challenge facing defenders cannot be attributed to AI alone. The rise of cybercrime as-a-service is also changing the dynamic. Darktrace’s 2023 End of Year Threat Report found that cybercrime-as-a-service continue to dominate the threat landscape, with malware-as-a-Service (MaaS) and ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) tools making up most malicious tools in use by attackers. The as-a-Service ecosystem can provide attackers with everything from pre-made malware to templates for phishing emails, payment processing systems and even helplines to enable bad actors to mount attacks with limited technical knowledge.

These trends make it clear that attackers now have a more widely accessible toolbox that reduces their barriers.

AI Enabling Accidental Insider Threats

However, the new risks facing businesses aren’t from external threat actors alone. Use of generative AI tools within the enterprise introduces a new category of accidental insider threats. Employees using generative AI tools now have easier access to more organizational data than ever before. Even the most well-intentioned employee could unintentionally leak or access restricted, sensitive data via these tools. In the second half of 2023, we observed that approximately half of Darktrace customers had employees accessing generative AI services. As this continues to increase, organizations need policies in place to guide the use cases for generative AI tools as well as strong data governance and the ability to enforce these policies to minimize risk.

It is inevitable that AI will increase the risks and threats facing an organization, but this is not an unsolvable challenge from a defensive perspective. While advancements in generative AI may be worsening issues like novel social engineering and creating new types of accidental insider threats, AI itself offers a strong defense.

The Shift to Proactive Cyber Readiness

According to the World Economic Forum’s Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2024, the number of organizations that “maintain minimum viable cyber resilience is down 30 percent compared to 2023”, and “while large organizations have demonstrated gains in cyber resilience, small and medium-sized companies showed significant decline.” The importance of cyber resilience cannot be understated in the face of today’s increasingly as-a-service, automated, and AI-augmented threat landscape.

Historically, organizations wait for incidents to happen and rely on known attack data for threat detection and response, making it nearly impossible to identify never-before-seen threats. The traditional security stack has also relied heavily on point solutions focused on protecting different pieces of the digital environment, with individual tools for endpoint, email, network, on-premises data centers, SaaS applications, cloud, OT and beyond. These point solutions fail to correlate disparate incidents to form a complete picture of an orchestrated attack. Even with the addition of tools that can stitch together events from across the enterprise, they are in a reactive state that focuses heavily on threat detection and response.

Organizations need to evolve from a reactive posture to a stance of proactive cyber readiness. To do so, they need an approach that proactively identifies internal and external vulnerabilities, identifies gaps in security policy and process before an attack occurs, breaks down silos to investigate all threats (known and unknown) during an attack, and uplifts the human analyst beyond menial tasks to incident validation and recovery after an attack.

AI can help break down silos within the SOC and provide a more proactive approach to scale up and augment defenders. It provides richer context when it is fed information from multiple systems, data sets, and tools within the stack and can build an in-depth, real-time behavioural understanding of a business that humans alone cannot.

Lessons From AI in the SOC

At Darktrace, we’ve been applying AI to the challenge of cyber security for more than ten years, and we know that proactive cyber readiness requires the right mix of people, process, and technology.

When the right AI is applied responsibly to the right cyber security challenge, the impact on both the human security team and the business is profound.

AI can bring machine speed and scale to some of the most time-intensive, error-prone, and psychologically draining components of cyber security, helping humans focus on the value-added work that only they can provide. Incident response and continuous monitoring are two areas where AI has already been proven to effectively augment defenders. For example, a civil engineering company used Darktrace’s AI to uplift its SOC team from the repetitive, manual tasks of analyzing and responding to email incidents. The analysts estimated they were each spending 10 hours per week on email incident analysis. With AI autonomously analyzing and responding to email incidents, the analysts could gain approximately 20 percent of their time back to focus on proactive cyber security measures

An effective human-AI partnership is key to proactive cyber readiness and can directly benefit the work-life of defenders. It can help to reduce burnout, support data-driven decision-making, and reduce the reliance on hard-to-find, specialized talent that has created a skills shortage in cyber security for many years. Most importantly, AI can free up team members to focus on more meaningful tasks, such as compliance initiatives, user education, and sophisticated threat hunting.

Advancements in AI are happening at a rapid pace. As we’ve already observed, attackers will be watching these developments and looking for ways to use it to their advantage. Luckily, AI has already proved to be an asset for defenders, and embracing a proactive approach to cyber resilience can help organizations increase their readiness for this next phase. Prioritizing cyber security will be an enabler of innovation and progress as AI development continues.

Join Darktrace on 9 April for a virtual event to explore the latest innovations needed to get ahead of the rapidly evolving threat landscape. Register today to hear more about our latest innovations coming to Darktrace’s offerings.

References

[1] The survey was undertaken by AimPoint Group & Dynata on behalf Darktrace between December 2023 & January 2024. The research polled 1773 security professionals in positions across the security team from junior roles to CISOs, across 14 countries – Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, UAE, UK, and USA.

[2] Based on the average change in email attacks between January and February 2023 detected across Darktrace/Email deployments with control of outliers.

[3] Average calculated across Darktrace customers from 31^st August to 21^st December.

[4] Average calculated across Darktrace customers from 31^st August to 21^st December. Novel social engineering attacks use linguistic techniques that are different to techniques used in the past, as measured by a combination of semantics, phrasing, text volume, punctuation, and sentence length.

Written by

Max Heinemeyer

Global Field CISO

Inside the SOC

Written by

Max Heinemeyer

Global Field CISO

The Darktrace Community

Watch the NIS2 Webinar

Blog

July 1, 2025

Pre-CVE Threat Detection: 8 Examples Identifying Malicious Activity Prior to Public Disclosure of a Vulnerability

Can you detect cyber threats before the world knows about them?

Every year, tens of thousands of Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) are disclosed, over 40,000 in 2024 alone [1], and a predicted higher number for 2025 by the Forum for Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST).

However, cybercriminals don't wait for disclosure. They exploit zero-days while defenders remain in the dark.

Traditional, signature-based tools struggle to detect these early-stage threats. That’s why anomaly detection is becoming essential for organizations seeking pre-CVE detection.

Understanding the gap between zero-day attacks and public CVE disclosure

When a vulnerability is discovered, the standard practice is to report it to the vendor or the responsible organization, allowing them to develop and distribute a patch or fix before the details are made public. This is known as responsible disclosure.

The gap between exploitation of a zero-day and the disclosure of the vulnerability can sometimes be considerable, and retroactively attempting to identify successful exploitation on your network can be challenging, particularly if taking a signature-based approach.

However, abnormal behaviors in networks or systems, such as unusual login patterns or data transfers, can indicate attempted cyber-attacks, insider threats, or compromised systems.

Detecting threats without relying on CVE disclosure

Since Darktrace does not rely on rules or signatures, it can detect malicious activity that is anomalous even without full context of the specific device or asset in question.

For example, during the Fortinet exploitation late last year, the Darktrace Threat Research team were investigating a different Fortinet vulnerability, namely CVE 2024-23113, for exploitation when Mandiant released a security advisory around CVE 2024-47575, which aligned closely with Darktrace’s findings.

Retrospective analysis like this is used by Darktrace’s threat researchers to better understand detections across the threat landscape and to add additional context.

Below are eight examples from the past year where Darktrace detected malicious activity days or even weeks before a vulnerability was publicly disclosed.

ten examples from the past year where Darktrace detected malicious activity days or even weeks before a vulnerability was publicly disclosed.

Trends in pre-cve exploitation

The attack vs. patch race

In many cases, the disclosure of an exploited vulnerability can be off the back of an incident response investigation related to a compromise by an advanced threat actor using a zero-day. Once the vulnerability is registered and publicly disclosed as having been exploited, it can kick off a race between the attacker and defender.

Skilled nation-state actors

Nation-state actors, highly skilled with significant resources, are known to use a range of capabilities to achieve their target, including zero-day use. Often, pre-CVE activity is “low and slow”, last for months with high operational security.

After CVE disclosure, the barriers to entry lower, allowing less skilled and less resourced attackers, like some ransomware gangs, to exploit the vulnerability and cause harm. This is why two distinct types of activity are often seen: pre and post disclosure of an exploited vulnerability.

Examples of exploitation

Darktrace saw this consistent story line play out during several of the Fortinet and PAN OS threat actor campaigns highlighted above last year, where nation-state actors were seen exploiting vulnerabilities first, followed by ransomware gangs impacting organizations [2].

The same applies with the recent SAP Netweaver exploitations being tied to a China based threat actor earlier this spring with subsequent ransomware incidents being observed [3].

You spotted the anomaly but did you stop the breach?

Anomaly-based detection offers the benefit of identifying malicious activity even before a CVE is disclosed; however, security teams still need to quickly contain and isolate the activity.

For example, during the Ivanti chaining exploitation in the early part of 2025, a customer had Darktrace’s Autonomous Response capability enabled on their network. As a result, Darktrace was able to contain the compromise and shut down any ongoing suspicious connectivity by blocking internal connections and enforcing a “pattern of life” on the affected device.

This pre-CVE detection and response by Darktrace occurred 11 days before any public disclosure, demonstrating the value of an anomaly-based approach.

In some cases, customers have even reported that Darktrace stopped malicious exploitation of devices several days before a public disclosure of a vulnerability.

For example, During the ConnectWise exploitation, a customer informed the team that Darktrace had detected malicious software being installed via remote access. Upon further investigation, four servers were found to be impacted, while Autonomous Response had blocked outbound connections and enforced patterns of life on impacted devices.

Conclusion

By continuously analyzing behavioral patterns, systems can spot unusual activities and patterns from users, systems, and networks to detect anomalies that could signify a security breach.

Through ongoing monitoring and learning from these behaviors, anomaly-based security systems can detect threats that traditional signature-based solutions might miss, while also providing detailed insights into threat tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). This type of behavioral intelligence supports pre-CVE detection, allows for a more adaptive security posture, and enables systems to evolve with the ever-changing threat landscape.

Credit to Nathaniel Jones (VP, Security & AI Strategy, Field CISO), Emma Fougler (Global Threat Research Operations Lead), Ryan Traill (Analyst Content Lead)

References and further reading:

Realted Darktrace blogs:

‍

*Self-reported by customer, confirmed afterwards.

**Updated January 2024 blog now reflects current findings

About the author

Blog

Network

June 27, 2025

Patch and Persist: Darktrace’s Detection of Blind Eagle (APT-C-36)

login on laptop dual factor authentication

What is Blind Eagle?

Since 2018, APT-C-36, also known as Blind Eagle, has been observed performing cyber-attacks targeting various sectors across multiple countries in Latin America, with a particular focus on Colombian organizations.

Blind Eagle characteristically targets government institutions, financial organizations, and critical infrastructure [1][2].

Attacks carried out by Blind Eagle actors typically start with a phishing email and the group have been observed utilizing various Remote Access Trojans (RAT) variants, which often have in-built methods for hiding command-and-control (C2) traffic from detection [3].

What we know about Blind Eagle from a recent campaign

Since November 2024, Blind Eagle actors have been conducting an ongoing campaign targeting Colombian organizations [1].

In this campaign, threat actors have been observed using phishing emails to deliver malicious URL links to targeted recipients, similar to the way threat actors have previously been observed exploiting CVE-2024-43451, a vulnerability in Microsoft Windows that allows the disclosure of a user’s NTLMv2 password hash upon minimal interaction with a malicious file [4].

Despite Microsoft patching this vulnerability in November 2024 [1][4], Blind Eagle actors have continued to exploit the minimal interaction mechanism, though no longer with the intent of harvesting NTLMv2 password hashes. Instead, phishing emails are sent to targets containing a malicious URL which, when clicked, initiates the download of a malicious file. This file is then triggered by minimal user interaction.

Clicking on the file triggers a WebDAV request, with a connection being made over HTTP port 80 using the user agent ‘Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/10.0.19044’. WebDAV is a transmission protocol which allows files or complete directories to be made available through the internet, and to be transmitted to devices [5]. The next stage payload is then downloaded via another WebDAV request and malware is executed on the target device.

Attackers are notified when a recipient downloads the malicious files they send, providing an insight into potential targets [1].

Darktrace’s coverage of Blind Eagle

In late February 2025, Darktrace observed activity assessed with medium confidence to be associated with Blind Eagle on the network of a customer in Colombia.

Within a period of just five hours, Darktrace / NETWORK detected a device being redirected through a rare external location, downloading multiple executable files, and ultimately exfiltrating data from the customer’s environment.

Since the customer did not have Darktrace’s Autonomous Response capability enabled on their network, no actions were taken to contain the compromise, allowing it to escalate until the customer’s security team responded to the alerts provided by Darktrace.

Darktrace observed a device on the customer’s network being directed over HTTP to a rare external IP, namely 62[.]60[.]226[.]112, which had never previously been seen in this customer’s environment and was geolocated in Germany. Multiple open-source intelligence (OSINT) providers have since linked this endpoint with phishing and malware campaigns [9].

The device then proceeded to download the executable file hxxp://62[.]60[.]226[.]112/file/3601_2042.exe.

Figure 1: Darktrace’s detection of the affected device connecting to an unusual location based in Germany.

Figure 2: Darktrace’s detection of the affected device downloading an executable file from the suspicious endpoint.

The device was then observed making unusual connections to the rare endpoint 21ene.ip-ddns[.]com and performing unusual external data activity.

This dynamic DNS endpoint allows a device to access an endpoint using a domain name in place of a changing IP address. Dynamic DNS services ensure the DNS record of a domain name is automatically updated when the IP address changes. As such, malicious actors can use these services and endpoints to dynamically establish connections to C2 infrastructure [6].

Further investigation into this dynamic endpoint using OSINT revealed multiple associations with previous likely Blind Eagle compromises, as well as Remcos malware, a RAT commonly deployed via phishing campaigns [7][8][10].

Figure 3: Darktrace’s detection of the affected device connecting to the suspicious dynamic DNS endpoint, 21ene.ip-ddns[.]com.

Shortly after this, Darktrace observed the user agent ‘Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/10.0.19045’, indicating usage of the aforementioned transmission protocol WebDAV. The device was subsequently observed connected to an endpoint associated with Github and downloading data, suggesting that the device was retrieving a malicious tool or payload. The device then began to communicate to the malicious endpoint diciembrenotasenclub[.]longmusic[.]com over the new TCP port 1512 [11].

Around this time, the device was also observed uploading data to the endpoints 21ene.ip-ddns[.]com and diciembrenotasenclub[.]longmusic[.]com, with transfers of 60 MiB and 5.6 MiB observed respectively.

Figure 4: UI graph showing external data transfer activity.

This chain of activity triggered an Enhanced Monitoring model alert in Darktrace / NETWORK. These high-priority model alerts are designed to trigger in response to higher fidelity indicators of compromise (IoCs), suggesting that a device is performing activity consistent with a compromise.

Figure 5: Darktrace’s detection of initial attack chain activity.

A second Enhanced Monitoring model was also triggered by this device following the download of the aforementioned executable file (hxxp://62[.]60[.]226[.]112/file/3601_2042.exe) and the observed increase in C2 activity.

Following this activity, Darktrace continued to observe the device beaconing to the 21ene.ip-ddns[.]com endpoint.

Darktrace’s Cyber AI Analyst was able to correlate each of the individual detections involved in this compromise, identifying them as part of a broader incident that encompassed C2 connectivity, suspicious downloads, and external data transfers.

Figure 6: Cyber AI Analyst’s investigation into the activity observed on the affected device.

Figure 7: Cyber AI Analyst’s detection of the affected device’s broader connectivity throughout the course of the attack.

As the affected customer did not have Darktrace’s Autonomous Response configured at the time, the attack was able to progress unabated. Had Darktrace been properly enabled, it would have been able to take a number of actions to halt the escalation of the attack.

For example, the unusual beaconing connections and the download of an unexpected file from an uncommon location would have been shut down by blocking the device from making external connections to the relevant destinations.

Conclusion

The persistence of Blind Eagle and ability to adapt its tactics, even after patches were released, and the speed at which the group were able to continue using pre-established TTPs highlights that timely vulnerability management and patch application, while essential, is not a standalone defense.

Organizations must adopt security solutions that use anomaly-based detection to identify emerging and adapting threats by recognizing deviations in user or device behavior that may indicate malicious activity. Complementing this with an autonomous decision maker that can identify, connect, and contain compromise-like activity is crucial for safeguarding organizational networks against constantly evolving and sophisticated threat actors.

Credit to Charlotte Thompson (Senior Cyber Analyst), Eugene Chua (Principal Cyber Analyst) and Ryan Traill (Analyst Content Lead)

Appendices

IoCs

IoC – Type - Confidence
Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/10.0.19045 – User Agent

62[.]60[.]226[.]112 – IP – Medium Confidence

hxxp://62[.]60[.]226[.]112/file/3601_2042.exe – Payload Download – Medium Confidence

21ene.ip-ddns[.]com – Dynamic DNS Endpoint – Medium Confidence

diciembrenotasenclub[.]longmusic[.]com - Hostname – Medium Confidence

Darktrace’s model alert coverage

Anomalous File / Suspicious HTTP Redirect
Anomalous File / EXE from Rare External Location
Anomalous File / Multiple EXE from Rare External Location
Anomalous Server Activity / Outgoing from Server
Unusual Activity / Unusual External Data to New Endpoint
Device / Anomalous Github Download
Anomalous Connection / Multiple Connections to New External TCP Port
Device / Initial Attack Chain Activity
Anomalous Server Activity / Rare External from Server
Compromise / Suspicious File and C2
Compromise / Fast Beaconing to DGA
Compromise / Large Number of Suspicious Failed Connections
Device / Large Number of Model Alert

Mitre Attack Mapping:

Tactic – Technique – Technique Name

Initial Access - T1189 – Drive-by Compromise
Initial Access - T1190 – Exploit Public-Facing Application
Initial Access ICS - T0862 – Supply Chain Compromise
Initial Access ICS - T0865 – Spearphishing Attachment
Initial Access ICS - T0817 - Drive-by Compromise
Resource Development - T1588.001 – Malware
Lateral Movement ICS - T0843 – Program Download
Command and Control - T1105 - Ingress Tool Transfer
Command and Control - T1095 – Non-Application Layer Protocol
Command and Control - T1571 – Non-Standard Port
Command and Control - T1568.002 – Domain Generation Algorithms
Command and Control ICS - T0869 – Standard Application Layer Protocol
Evasion ICS - T0849 – Masquerading
Exfiltration - T1041 – Exfiltration Over C2 Channel
Exfiltration - T1567.002 – Exfiltration to Cloud Storage