November 20, 2025

Xillen Stealer Updates to Version 5 to Evade AI Detection

Xillen Stealer v4/v5 introduces advanced features to evade AI detection, steal credentials, cryptocurrency, and sensitive data across browsers, password managers, and cloud environments. With polymorphic engines, container persistence, and behavioral mimicking, this Python-based malware highlights evolving threats and future AI integration in cybercrime campaigns.

Written by

Tara Gould

Malware Research Lead

Inside the SOC

Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.

Written by

Tara Gould

Malware Research Lead

xillen stealer updates to version 5 to evade ai detection

Nov 2025

Introduction

Python-based information stealer “Xillen Stealer” has recently released versions 4 and 5, expanding its targeting and functionality. The cross-platform infostealer, originally reported by Cyfirma in September 2025, targets sensitive data including credentials, cryptocurrency wallets, system information, browser data and employs anti-analysis techniques.

The update to v4/v5 includes significantly more functionality, including:

Persistence
Ability to steal credentials from password managers, social media accounts, browser data (history, cookies and passwords) from over 100 browsers, cryptocurrency from over 70 wallets
Kubernetes configs and secrets
Docker scanning
Encryption
Polymorphism
System hooks
Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Command-and-Control (C2)
Single Sign-On (SSO) collector
Time-Based One-Time Passwords (TOTP) and biometric collection
EDR bypass
AI evasion
Interceptor for Two-Factor Authentication (2FA)
IoT scanning
Data exfiltration via Cloud APIs

Xillen Stealer is marketed on Telegram, with different licenses available for purchase. Users who deploy the malware have access to a professional-looking GUI that enables them to view exfiltrated data, logs, infections, configurations and subscription information.

Figure 1: Screenshot of the Xillen Stealer portal.

Technical analysis

The following technical analysis examines some of the interesting functions of Xillen Stealer v4 and v5. The main functionality of Xillen Stealer is to steal cryptocurrency, credentials, system information, and account information from a range of stores.

Xillen Stealer specifically targets the following wallets and browsers:

AITargetDectection

Figure 2: Screenshot of Xillen Stealer’s AI Target detection function.

The ‘AITargetDetection’ class is intended to use AI to detect high-value targets based on weighted indicators and relevant keywords defined in a dictionary. These indicators include “high value targets”, like cryptocurrency wallets, banking data, premium accounts, developer accounts, and business emails. Location indicators include high-value countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Japan, along with cryptocurrency-friendly countries and financial hubs. Wealth indicators such as keywords like CEO, trader, investor and VIP have also been defined in a dictionary but are not in use at this time, pointing towards the group’s intent to develop further in the future.

While the class is named ‘AITargetDetection’ and includes placeholder functions for initializing and training a machine learning model, there is no actual implementation of machine learning. Instead, the system relies entirely on rule-based pattern matching for detection and scoring. Even though AI is not actually implemented in this code, it shows how malware developers could use AI in future malicious campaigns.

Figure 3: Screenshot of dead code function.

AI Evasion

‘AIEvasionEngine’ is a module designed to help malware evade AI-based or behavior-based detection systems, such as EDRs and sandboxes. It mimics legitimate user and system behavior, injects statistical noise, randomizes execution patterns, and camouflages resource usage. Its goal is to make the malware appear benign to machine learning detectors. The techniques used to achieve this are:

‍Behavioral Mimicking: Simulates user actions (mouse movement, fake browser use, file/network activity)‍
Noise Injection: Performs random memory, CPU, file, and network operations to confuse behavioral classifiers‍
Timing Randomization: Introduces irregular delays and sleep patterns to avoid timing-based anomaly detection‍
Resource Camouflage: Adjusts CPU and memory usage to imitate normal apps (such as browsers, text editors)‍
API Call Obfuscation: Random system API calls and pattern changes to hide malicious intent‍
Memory Access Obfuscation: Alters access patterns and entropy to bypass ML models monitoring memory behavior

PolymorphicEngine

As part of the “Rust Engine” available in Xillen Stealer is the Polymorphic Engine. The ‘PolymorphicEngine’ struct implements a basic polymorphic transformation system designed for obfuscation and detection evasion. It uses predefined instruction substitutions, control-flow pattern replacements, and dead code injection to produce varied output. The mutate_code() method scans input bytes and replaces recognized instruction patterns with randomized alternatives, then applies control flow obfuscation and inserts non-functional code to increase variability. Additional features include string encryption via XOR and a stub-based packer.

Collectors

DevToolsCollector

Figure 5: Screenshot of Kubernetes data function.

The ‘DevToolsCollector’ is designed to collect sensitive data related to a wide range of developer tools and environments. This includes:

IDE configurations

VS Code, VS Code Insiders, Visual Studio
JetBrains: Intellij, PyCharm, WebStorm
Sublime
Atom
Notepad++
Eclipse

Cloud credentials and configurations

AWS
GCP
Azure
Digital Ocean
Heroku

SSH keys

Docker & Kubernetes configurations

Git credentials

Database connection information

HeidiSQL
Navicat
DBeaver
MySQL Workbench
pgAdmin

API keys from .env files

FTP configs

FileZilla
WinSCP
Core FTP

VPN configurations

OpenVPN
WireGuard
NordVPN
ExpressVPN
CyberGhost

Container persistence

Figure 6: Screenshot of Kubernetes inject function.

Biometric Collector

The ‘BiometricCollector’ attempts to collect biometric information from Windows systems by scanning the C:\Windows\System32\WinBioDatabase directory, which stores Windows Hello and other biometric configuration data. If accessible, it reads the contents of each file, encodes them in Base64, preparing them for later exfiltration. While the data here is typically encrypted by Windows, its collection indicates an attempt to extract sensitive biometric data.

Password Managers

The ‘PasswordManagerCollector’ function attempts to steal credentials stored in password managers including, OnePass, LastPass, BitWarden, Dashlane, NordPass and KeePass. However, this function is limited to Windows systems only.

SSOCollector

The ‘SSOCollector’ class is designed to collect authentication tokens related to SSO systems. It targets three main sources: Azure Active Directory tokens stored under TokenBroker\Cache, Kerberos tickets obtained through the klist command, and Google Cloud authentication data in user configuration folders. For each source, it checks known directories or commands, reads partial file contents, and stores the results as in a dictionary. Once again, this function is limited to Windows systems.

TOTP Collector

The ‘TOTP Collector’ class attempts to collect TOTPs from:

Authy Desktop by locating and reading from Authy.db SQLite databases
Microsoft Authenticator by scanning known application data paths for stored binary files
TOTP-related Chrome extensions by searching LevelDB files for identifiable keywords like “gauth” or “authenticator”.

Each method attempts to locate relevant files, parse or partially read their contents, and store them in a dictionary under labels like authy, microsoft_auth, or chrome_extension. However, as before, this is limited to Windows, and there is no handling for encrypted tokens.

Enterprise Collector

The ‘EnterpriseCollector’ class is used to extract credentials related to an enterprise Windows system. It targets configuration and credential data from:

VPN clients
- Cisco AnyConnect, OpenVPN, Forticlient, Pulse Secure
RDP credentials
Corporate certificates
Active Directory tokens
Kerberos tickets cache

The files and directories are located based on standard environment variables with their contents read in binary mode and then encoded in Base64.

Super Extended Application Collector

The ‘SuperExtendedApplication’ Collector class is designed to scan an environment for 160 different applications on a Windows system. It iterates through the paths of a wide range of software categories including messaging apps, cryptocurrency wallets, password managers, development tools, enterprise tools, gaming clients, and security products. The list includes but is not limited to Teams, Slack, Mattermost, Zoom, Google Meet, MS Office, Defender, Norton, McAfee, Steam, Twitch, VMWare, to name a few.

Bypass

AppBoundBypass

This code outlines a framework for bypassing App Bound protections, Google Chrome' s cookie encryption. The ‘AppBoundBypass’ class attempts several evasion techniques, including memory injection, dynamic-link library (DLL) hijacking, process hollowing, atom bombing, and process doppelgänging to impersonate or hijack browser processes. As of the time of writing, the code contains multiple placeholders, indicating that the code is still in development.

Steganography

The ‘SteganographyModule’ uses steganography (hiding data within an image) to hide the stolen data, staging it for exfiltration. Multiple methods are implemented, including:

Image steganography: LSB-based hiding
NTFS Alternate Data Streams
Windows Registry Keys
Slack space: Writing into unallocated disk cluster space
Polyglot files: Appending archive data to images
Image metadata: Embedding data in EXIF tags
Whitespace encoding: Hiding binary in trailing spaces of text files

Exfiltration

CloudProxy

The CloudProxy class is designed for exfiltrating data by routing it through cloud service domains. It encodes the input data using Base64, attaches a timestamp and SHA-256 signature, and attempts to send this payload as a JSON object via HTTP POST requests to cloud URLs including AWS, GCP, and Azure, allowing the traffic to blend in. As of the time of writing, these public facing URLs do not accept POST requests, indicating that they are placeholders meant to be replaced with attacker-controlled cloud endpoints in a finalized build.

P2PEngine

The ‘P2PEngine’ provides multiple methods of C2, including embedding instructions within blockchain transactions (such as Bitcoin OP_RETURN, Ethereum smart contracts), exfiltrating data via anonymizing networks like Tor and I2P, and storing payloads on IPFS (a distributed file system). It also supports domain generation algorithms (DGA) to create dynamic .onion addresses for evading detection.

After a compromise, the stealer creates both HTML and TXT reports containing the stolen data. It then sends these reports to the attacker’s designated Telegram account.

Xillen Killers

Xillen Stealer appears to be developed by a self-described 15-year-old “pentest specialist” “Beng/jaminButton” who creates TikTok videos showing basic exploits and open-source intelligence (OSINT) techniques. The group distributing the information stealer, known as “Xillen Killers”, claims to have 3,000 members. Additionally, the group claims to have been involved in:

Analysis of Project DDoSia, a tool reportedly used by the NoName057(16) group, revealing that rather functioning as a distributed denial-of-service (DDos) tool, it is actually a remote access trojan (RAT) and stealer, along with the identification of involved individuals.
Compromise of doxbin.net in October 2025.
Discovery of vulnerabilities on a Russian mods site and a Ukrainian news site

The group, which claims to be part of the Russian IT scene, use Telegram for logging, marketing, and support.

‍

Conclusion

While some components of XillenStealer remain underdeveloped, the range of intended feature set, which includes credential harvesting, cryptocurrency theft, container targeting, and anti-analysis techniques, suggests that once fully developed it could become a sophisticated stealer. The intention to use AI to help improve targeting in malware campaigns, even though not yet implemented, indicates how threat actors are likely to incorporate AI into future campaigns.
‍

Credit to Tara Gould (Threat Research Lead)
Edited by Ryan Traill (Analyst Content Lead)

Appendicies

Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)

395350d9cfbf32cef74357fd9cb66134 - confid.py

F3ce485b669e7c18b66d09418e979468 - stealer_v5_ultimate.py

3133fe7dc7b690264ee4f0fb6d867946 - xillen_v5.exe

https://github[.]com/BengaminButton/XillenStealer

https://github[.]com/BengaminButton/XillenStealer/commit/9d9f105df4a6b20613e3a7c55379dcbf4d1ef465

MITRE ATT&CK

ID Technique

T1059.006 - Python

T1555 - Credentials from Password Stores

T1555.003 - Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers

T1555.005 - Credentials from Password Stores: Password Managers

T1649 - Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates

T1558 - Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets

T1539 - Steal Web Session Cookie

T1552.001 - Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files

T1552.004 - Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys

T1552.005 - Unsecured Credentials: Cloud Instance Metadata API

T1217 - Browser Information Discovery

T1622 - Debugger Evasion

T1082 - System Information Discovery

T1497.001 - Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: System Checks

T1115 - Clipboard Data

T1001.002 - Data Obfuscation: Steganography

T1567 - Exfiltration Over Web Service

T1657 - Financial Theft

Written by

Tara Gould

Malware Research Lead

Inside the SOC

Written by

Tara Gould

Malware Research Lead

Global Threat Research Operations Lead

Watch the NIS2 Webinar

Blog

AI

March 2, 2026

What the Darktrace Annual Threat Report 2026 Means for Security Leaders

The challenge for today’s CISOs

At the broadest level, the defining characteristic of cybersecurity in 2026 is the sheer pace of change shaping the environments we protect. Organizations are operating in ecosystems that are larger, more interconnected, and more automated than ever before – spanning cloud platforms, distributed identities, AI-driven systems, and continuous digital workflows.

The velocity of this expansion has outstripped the slower, predictable patterns security teams once relied on. What used to be a stable backdrop is now a living, shifting landscape where technology, risk, and business operations evolve simultaneously. From this vantage point, the central challenge for security leaders isn’t reacting to individual threats, but maintaining strategic control and clarity as the entire environment accelerates around them.

Strategic takeaways from the Annual Threat Report

The Darktrace Annual Threat Report 2026 reinforces a reality every CISO feels: the center of gravity isn’t the perimeter, vulnerability management, or malware, but trust abused via identity. For example, our analysis found that nearly 70% of incidents in the Americas region begin with stolen or misused accounts, reflecting the global shift toward identity‑led intrusions.

Mass adoption of AI agents, cloud-native applications, and machine decision-making means CISOs now oversee systems that act on their own. This creates an entirely new responsibility: ensuring those systems remain safe, predictable, and aligned to business intent, even under adversarial pressure.

Attackers increasingly exploit trust boundaries, not firewalls – leveraging cloud entitlements, SaaS identity transitions, supply-chain connectivity, and automation frameworks. The rise of non-human identities intensifies this: credentials, tokens, and agent permissions now form the backbone of operational risk.

Boards are now evaluating CISOs on business continuity, operational recovery, and whether AI systems and cloud workloads can fail safely without cascading or causing catastrophic impact.

In this environment, detection accuracy, autonomous response, and blast radius minimization matter far more than traditional control coverage or policy checklists.

Every organization will face setbacks; resilience is measured by how quickly security teams can rise, respond, and resume momentum. In 2026, success will belong to those that adapt fastest.

Managing business security in the age of AI

CISO accountability in 2026 has expanded far beyond controls and tooling. Whether we asked for it or not, we now own outcomes tied to business resilience, AI trust, cloud assurance, and continuous availability. The role is less about certainty and more about recovering control in an environment that keeps accelerating.

Every major 2026 initiative – AI agents, third-party risk, cloud, or comms protection – connects to a single board-level question: Are we still in control as complexity and automation scale faster than humans?

Attackers are not just getting more sophisticated; they are becoming more automated. AI changes the economics of attack, lowering cost and increasing speed. That asymmetry is what CISOs are being measured against.

CISOs are no longer evaluated on tool coverage, but on the ability to assure outcomes – trust in AI adoption, resilience across cloud and identity, and being able to respond to unknown and unforeseen threats.

Boards are now explicitly asking whether we can defend against AI-driven threats. No one can predict every new behavior – survival depends on detecting malicious deviations from normal fast and responding autonomously.

Agents introduce decision-making at machine speed. Governance, CI/CD scanning, posture management, red teaming, and runtime detection are no longer differentiators but the baseline.

Cloud security is no longer architectural, it is operational. Identity, control planes, and SaaS exposure now sit firmly with the CISO.

AI-speed threats already reshaping security in 2026

We’re already seeing clear examples of how quickly the threat landscape has shifted in 2026. Darktrace’s work on React2Shell exposed just how unforgiving the new tempo is: a honeypot stood up with an exposed React was hit in under two minutes. There was no recon phase, no gradual probing – just immediate, automated exploitation the moment the code appeared publicly. Exposure now equals compromise unless defenses can detect, interpret, and act at machine speed. Traditional operational rhythms simply don’t map to this reality.

We’re also facing the first wave of AI-authored malware, where LLMs generate code that mutates on demand. This removes the historic friction from the attacker side: no skill barrier, no time cost, no limit on iteration. Malware families can regenerate themselves, shift structure, and evade static controls without a human operator behind the keyboard. This forces CISOs to treat adversarial automation as a core operational risk and ensure that autonomous systems inside the business remain predictable under pressure.

The CVE-2026-1731 BeyondTrust exploitation wave reinforced the same pattern. The gap between disclosure and active, global exploitation compressed into hours. Automated scanning, automated payload deployment, coordinated exploitation campaigns, all spinning up faster than most organizations can push an emergency patch through change control. The vulnerability-to-exploit window has effectively collapsed, making runtime visibility, anomaly detection, and autonomous containment far more consequential than patching speed alone.

These cases aren’t edge scenarios; they represent the emerging norm. Complexity and automation have outpaced human-scale processes, and attackers are weaponizing that asymmetry.

The real differentiator for CISOs in 2026 is less about knowing everything and more about knowing immediately when something shifts – and having systems that can respond at the same speed.

[related-resource]

About the author

Mike Beck

Global CISO

Blog

Network

March 2, 2026

CVE-2026-1731: How Darktrace Sees the BeyondTrust Exploitation Wave Unfolding

Note: Darktrace's Threat Research team is publishing now to help defenders. We will continue updating this blog as our investigations unfold.

Background

On February 6, 2026, the Identity & Access Management solution BeyondTrust announced patches for a vulnerability, CVE-2026-1731, which enables unauthenticated remote code execution using specially crafted requests. This vulnerability affects BeyondTrust Remote Support (RS) and particular older versions of Privileged Remote Access (PRA) [1].

A Proof of Concept (PoC) exploit for this vulnerability was released publicly on February 10, and open-source intelligence (OSINT) reported exploitation attempts within 24 hours [2].

Previous intrusions against Beyond Trust technology have been cited as being affiliated with nation-state attacks, including a 2024 breach targeting the U.S. Treasury Department. This incident led to subsequent emergency directives from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and later showed attackers had chained previously unknown vulnerabilities to achieve their goals [3].

Additionally, there appears to be infrastructure overlap with React2Shell mass exploitation previously observed by Darktrace, with command-and-control (C2) domain avg.domaininfo[.]top seen in potential post-exploitation activity for BeyondTrust, as well as in a React2Shell exploitation case involving possible EtherRAT deployment.

Darktrace Detections

Darktrace’s Threat Research team has identified highly anomalous activity across several customers that may relate to exploitation of BeyondTrust since February 10, 2026. Observed activities include:

Outbound connections and DNS requests for endpoints associated with Out-of-Band Application Security Testing; these services are commonly abused by threat actors for exploit validation. Associated Darktrace models include:

Compromise / Possible Tunnelling to Bin Services

Suspicious executable file downloads. Associated Darktrace models include:‍

Anomalous File / EXE from Rare External Location

Outbound beaconing to rare domains. Associated Darktrace models include:

Compromise / Agent Beacon (Medium Period)
Compromise / Agent Beacon (Long Period)
Compromise / Sustained TCP Beaconing Activity To Rare Endpoint
Compromise / Beacon to Young Endpoint
Anomalous Server Activity / Rare External from Server
Compromise / SSL Beaconing to Rare Destination

Unusual cryptocurrency mining activity. Associated Darktrace models include:

Compromise / Monero Mining
Compromise / High Priority Crypto Currency Mining

And model alerts for:

Compromise / Rare Domain Pointing to Internal IP

IT Defenders: As part of best practices, we highly recommend employing an automated containment solution in your environment. For Darktrace customers, please ensure that Autonomous Response is configured correctly. More guidance regarding this activity and suggested actions can be found in the Darktrace Customer Portal.

Appendices

Potential indicators of post-exploitation behavior:

· 217.76.57[.]78 – IP address - Likely C2 server

· hXXp://217.76.57[.]78:8009/index.js - URL - Likely payload

· b6a15e1f2f3e1f651a5ad4a18ce39d411d385ac7 - SHA1 - Likely payload

· 195.154.119[.]194 – IP address – Likely C2 server

· hXXp://195.154.119[.]194/index.js - URL – Likely payload

· avg.domaininfo[.]top – Hostname – Likely C2 server

· 104.234.174[.]5 – IP address - Possible C2 server

· 35da45aeca4701764eb49185b11ef23432f7162a – SHA1 – Possible payload

· hXXp://134.122.13[.]34:8979/c - URL – Possible payload

· 134.122.13[.]34 – IP address – Possible C2 server

· 28df16894a6732919c650cc5a3de94e434a81d80 - SHA1 - Possible payload

References:

1. https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1731

2. https://www.securityweek.com/beyondtrust-vulnerability-targeted-by-hackers-within-24-hours-of-poc-release/

3. https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-cve-2026-1731-critical-unauthenticated-remote-code-execution-rce-beyondtrust-remote-support-rs-privileged-remote-access-pra/

About the author

Emma Foulger

Global Threat Research Operations Lead

Your data. Our AI.

Elevate your network security with Darktrace AI

Get a demo

Check out this article by Darktrace: Xillen Stealer Updates to Version 5 to Evade AI Detection

Xillen Stealer Updates to Version 5 to Evade AI Detection

Introduction

Technical analysis

AITargetDectection

AI Evasion

PolymorphicEngine

Collectors

DevToolsCollector

Container persistence

Biometric Collector

SSOCollector

TOTP Collector

Enterprise Collector

Super Extended Application Collector

Bypass

AppBoundBypass

Steganography

Exfiltration

CloudProxy

P2PEngine

Xillen Killers

Conclusion

Appendicies

Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)

CVE-2026-1731: How Darktrace Sees the BeyondTrust Exploitation Wave Unfolding

What the Darktrace Annual Threat Report 2026 Means for Security Leaders

Enjoying the blog?

More in this series

CVE-2026-1731: How Darktrace Sees the BeyondTrust Exploitation Wave Unfolding

AI/LLM-Generated Malware Used to Exploit React2Shell

AppleScript Abuse: Unpacking a macOS Phishing Campaign

Blog

AI

March 2, 2026

What the Darktrace Annual Threat Report 2026 Means for Security Leaders

The challenge for today’s CISOs

Strategic takeaways from the Annual Threat Report

Managing business security in the age of AI

AI-speed threats already reshaping security in 2026

Blog

Network

March 2, 2026

CVE-2026-1731: How Darktrace Sees the BeyondTrust Exploitation Wave Unfolding

Background

Darktrace Detections

Appendices

Potential indicators of post-exploitation behavior:

References: