ブログ
/
AI
/
July 16, 2025

サイバーセキュリティのためのAI成熟度モデルの紹介

サイバーセキュリティのためのAI成熟度モデルは、実際のユースケースとエキスパートの知見に基づいた、この種の指針の中でも最も詳細なガイドです。CISOが戦略的な意思決定を行うための力となり、どのAIを導入すべきかだけではなく、組織を段階的に強化し優れた成果を得るためにどのように進めるべきかを知ることができます。
Inside the SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
Written by
Ashanka Iddya
Senior Director, Product Marketing
Default blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog image
16
Jul 2025

サイバーセキュリティへのAIの導入:宣伝文句を超えて

今日のセキュリティオペレーションはパラドックスに直面しています。業界ではAI(Artificial Intelligence)が全面的な変革を約束し、ルーチンタスクを自動化することにより検知と対処が強化されると言われています。しかしその一方で、セキュリティリーダーは意味のあるイノベーションとベンダーの宣伝文句を区別しなければならないという大きなプレッシャーに直面しています。

CISOとセキュリティチームがこの状況を乗り越えるのを支援するため、私たちは業界で最も詳細、かつアクション可能なAI成熟度モデルを作成しました。AIおよびサイバーセキュリティ分野のエキスパートと協力して作成したこの枠組みは、セキュリティライフサイクル全体を通じてAIの導入を理解し、測定し、進めていくためのしっかりとした道筋を提供します。

なぜ成熟度モデル?なぜ今必要?

セキュリティリーダー達との対話と調査の中で繰り返し浮かび上がってきたテーマがあります。

それは、AIソリューションはまったく不足していないが、AIのユースケースの明瞭性と理解が不足している、ということです。

事実、Gartner社は「2027年までに、エージェント型AIプロジェクトの40%以上が、コスト上昇、不明瞭なビジネス上の価値、あるいは不十分なリスク制御を理由として打ち切られるだろう」と予測しています。多くのセキュリティチームが実験を行っていますが、その多くは意味のある成果を得られていません。セキュリティの向上を評価し情報に基づいた投資を行うための、標準化された方法に対する必要性はかつてなく高まっています。

AI成熟度モデルが作成されたのはこのような背景によるものであり、これは次を行うための戦略的枠組みです:

  • 人手によるプロセス(L0)からAIへの委任(L4)に至る5段階の明確なAI成熟度を定義
  • エージェント型生成AIと専用AIエージェントシステムから得られる結果を区別
  • リスク管理、脅威検知、アラートトリアージ、インシデント対応といった中核的な機能にわたって評価
  • AI成熟度を、リスクの削減、効率の向上、スケーラブルなオペレーションなど、現実の成果に対応させる

[related-resource]

このモデルで成熟度はどのように評価されるか?

「サイバーセキュリティにおけるAI成熟度モデル」は、世界で10,000社に及ぶDarktraceの自己学習型AIおよびCyber AI Analystの導入例から得られたセキュリティオペレーションの知見に基づいています。抽象的な理論やベンダーのベンチマークに頼るのではなく、このモデルは実際にセキュリティチームが直面している課題に基づき、AIがどこに導入されているか、どのように使用されているか、そしてどのような成果をもたらしているかを反映しています。

こうした現実に即した基盤により、このモデルはAI成熟度に対する実務的な、体験に基づいた視点を提供します。セキュリティチームが現在の状態を把握し、同じような組織がどのように進化しているかに基づいて現実的な次のステップを知るのに役立ちます。

Darktraceを選ぶ理由

AIは2013年のダークトレースの設立以来そのミッションの中心であり、単なる機能ではなく、企業の基盤です。10年以上にわたりAIを開発し現実のセキュリティ環境にAIを適用してきた経験から、私たちはAIがどこに有効で、どこに有効でないか、そしてAIから最も大きな価値を得るにはどうすべきかを学びました。

私たちは、現代のビジネスが膨大な、相互に接続されたエコシステム内で動いていること、そしてそこには従来のサイバーセキュリティアプローチの維持を不可能にする新たな複雑さや脆弱さが生まれていることを知っています。多くのベンダーは機械学習を使用していますが、AIツールはそれぞれ異なり、どれも同じように作られているわけではありません。

Darktraceの自己学習型AIは多層的なAIアプローチを使用して、それぞれの組織から学習することにより、現代の高度な脅威に対するプロアクティブかつリジリエントな防御を提供します。機械学習、深層学習、LLM、自然言語処理を含む多様なAIテクニックを戦略的に組み合わせ、連続的、階層的に統合することにより、私たちの多層的AIアプローチはそれぞれの組織専用の、変化する脅威ランドスケープに適応する強力な防御メカニズムを提供します。

この成熟度モデルはこうした知見を反映し、セキュリティリーダーが組織の人、プロセス、ツールに適した適切な道筋を見つけるのに役立ちます。

今日のセキュリティチームは次のような重要な問いに直面しています:

  • AIを具体的に何のために使うべきか?
  • 他のチームはどのように使っているのか?そして何が機能しているのか?
  • ベンダーはどのようなツールを提供しているのか、そして何が単なる宣伝文句なのか?
  • AIはSOCの人員を置き換える可能性があるのか?

これらはもっともな質問ですが、簡単に答えられるとは限りません。それが、私たちがこのモデルを作成した理由です。セキュリティリーダーが単なるバズワードに惑わされず、SOC全体にAIを適用するための明確かつ現実的な計画を作成するのを助けるために、このモデルが作成されました。

構成:実験から自律性まで

このモデルは5つの成熟段階で構成されています:

L0 –  人手によるオペレーション:プロセスはほとんどが人手によるものであり、一部のタスクにのみ限定的な自動化が使用されます。

L1 –  自動化ルール:人手により管理されるか、外部ソースからの自動化ルールとロジックが可能な範囲で使用されます。    

L2 –  AIによる支援:AIは調査を支援するが、良い判断をするかどうかは信頼されていません。これには人手によるエラーの監視が必要な生成AIエージェントが含まれます。    

L3 –  AIコラボレーション:組織のテクノロジーコンテキストを理解した専用のサイバーセキュリティAIエージェントシステムに特定のタスクと判断を任せます。生成AIはエラーが許容可能な部分に使用が限定されます。  

L4 –  AIに委任:組織のオペレーションと影響について格段に幅広いコンテキストを備えた専用のAIエージェントがほとんどのサイバーセキュリティタスクと判断を単独で行い、ハイレベルの監督しか必要としません。

それぞれの段階が、テクノロジーだけではなく、人とプロセスもシフトすることを表しています。AIが成熟するにつれ、アナリストの役割は実行者から戦略的監督者へと進化します。

セキュリティリーダーにとっての戦略上の利益

成熟度モデルの目的はテクノロジーの導入だけではなく、AIへの投資を測定可能なオペレーションの成果に結びつけることです。AIによって次のことが可能になります:

SOCの疲労は切実、AIが軽減に貢献

ほとんどのセキュリティチームは現在もアラートの量、調査の遅延、受け身のプロセスに苦労しています。しかしAIの導入には一貫性がなく、多くの場合サイロ化しています。上手く統合すれば、AIはセキュリティチームの効率を高めるための、意味のある違いをもたらすことができます。

生成AIはエラーが起こりやすく、人間による厳密な監視が必要

生成AIを使ったエージェント型システムについては多くの誇大広告が見られますが、セキュリティチームはエージェント型生成AIシステムの不正確性とハルシネーションの可能性についても考慮に入れる必要があります。

AIの本当の価値はセキュリティの進化にある

AI導入の最も大きな成果は、リスク対策から検知、封じ込め、修復に至るまで、セキュリティライフサイクル全体にAIを統合することから得られます。

AIへの信頼と監督は初期段階で必須となるが次第に変化する

導入の初期段階では、人間が完全にコントロールします。L3からL4に到達する頃には、AIシステムは決められた境界内で独立して機能するようになり、人間の役割は戦略的監督になります。

人間の役割が意味のあるものに変化する

AIが成熟すると、アナリストの役割は労働集約的な作業から高価値な意思決定へと引き上げられ、重要な、ビジネスへの影響が大きいアクティビティやプロセスの改良、AIに対するガバナンスなどに集中できるようになります。

成熟度を定義するのは宣伝文句ではなく成果

AIの成熟度は単にテクノロジーが存在しているかどうかではなく、リスク削減、対処時間、オペレーションのリジリエンスに対して測定可能な効果が見られるかどうかで決まります。

[related-resource]

AI成熟度モデルの各段階の成果

セキュリティ組織は人手によるオペレーションからAIへの委任へと進むにつれてサイバーセキュリティの進化を体験するでしょう。成熟度の各レベルは、効率、精度、戦略的価値の段階的変化を表しています。

L0 – 人手によるオペレーション

この段階では、アナリストが手動でトリアージ、調査、パッチ適用、報告を、基本的な自動化されていないツールを使って行います。その結果、受け身の労働集約的なオペレーションになり、ほとんどのアラートは未調査のままとなり、リスク管理にも一貫性がありません。

L1 – 自動化ルール

この段階では、アナリストがSOARあるいはXDRといったルールベースの自動化ツールを管理します。これにより多少の効率化は図れますが、頻繁な調整を必要とします。オペレーションは依然として人員数と事前に定義されたワークフローに制限されます。

L2 – AIによる支援

この段階では、AIが調査、まとめ、トリアージを支援し、アナリストの作業負荷を軽減しますが、エラーの可能性もあるためきめ細かな監督が必要です。検知は向上しますが、自律的な意思決定に対する信頼度は限定的です。

L3 – AIコラボレーション

この段階では、AIが調査全体を行いアクションを提示します。アナリストは高リスクの判断を行うことと、検知戦略の精緻化に集中します。組織のテクノロジーコンテキストを考慮した専用のエージェント型AIエージェントシステムに特定のタスクが任され、精度と優先度の判断が向上します。

L4 – AIに委任

この段階では、専用のAIエージェントシステムが単独でほとんどのセキュリティタスクをマシンスピードで処理し、人間のチームはハイレベルの戦略的監督を行います。このことは、人間のセキュリティチームが最も時間と労力を使うアクティビティはプロアクティブな活動に向けられ、AIがルーチンのサイバーセキュリティ作業を処理することを意味します。

専用のAIエージェントシステムはビジネスへの影響を含めた深いコンテキストを理解して動作し、高速かつ効果的な判断を行います。

AI成熟度モデルのどこに位置しているかを調べる

「サイバーセキュリティのためのAI成熟度モデル」 ホワイトペーパーを入手し、評価を行ってみましょう。自社の現在の成熟段階をベンチマークし、主なギャップがどこにあるのかを調べ、次のステップの優先順位を特定するためににお役立てください。

Inside the SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
Written by
Ashanka Iddya
Senior Director, Product Marketing

More in this series

No items found.

Blog

/

Network

/

March 26, 2026

Phantom Footprints: Tracking GhostSocks Malware

Default blog imageDefault blog image

Why are attackers using residential proxies?

In today's threat landscape, blending in to normal activity is the key to success for attackers and the growing reliance on residential proxies shows a significant shift in how threat actors are attempting to bypass IP detection tools.

The increasing dependency on residential proxies has exposed how prevalent proxy services are and how reliant a diverse range of threat actors are on them. From cybercriminal groups to state‑sponsored actors, the need to bypass IP detection tools is fundamental to the success of these groups. One malware that has quietly become notorious for its ability to avoid anomaly detection is GhostSocks, a malware that turns compromised devices into residential proxies.

What is GhostSocks?

Originally marketed on the Russian underground forum xss[.]is as a Malware‑as‑a‑Service (MaaS), GhostSocks enables threat actors to turn compromised devices into residential proxies, leveraging the victim's internet bandwidth to route malicious traffic through it.

How does Ghostsocks malware work? 

The malware offers the threat actor a “clean” IP address, making it look like it is coming from a household user. This enables the bypassing of geographic restrictions and IP detection tools, a perfect tool for avoiding anomaly detection. It wasn’t until 2024, when a partnership was announced with the infamous information stealer Lumma Stealer, that GhostSocks surged into widespread adoption and alluded to who may be the author of the proxy malware.

Written in GoLang, GhostSocks utilizes the SOCKS5 proxy protocol, creating a SOCKS5 connection on infected devices. It uses a relay‑based C2 implementation, where an intermediary server sits in between the real command-and-control (C2) server and the infected device.

How does Ghostsocks malware evade detection?

To further increase evasion, the Ghostsocks malware wraps its SOCKS5 tunnels in TLS encryption, allowing its malicious traffic to blend into normal network traffic.

Early variants of GhostSocks do not implement a persistence mechanism; however, later versions achieve persistence via registry run keys, ensuring sustained proxy operational time [1].

While proxying is its primary purpose, GhostSocks also incorporates backdoor functionality, enabling malicious actors to run arbitrary commands and download and deploy additional malicious payloads. This was evident with the well‑known ransomware group Black Basta, which reportedly used GhostSocks as a way of maintaining long‑term access to victims’ networks [1].

Darktrace’s detection of GhostSocks Malware

Darktrace observed a steady increase in GhostSocks activity across its customer base from late 2025, with its Threat Research team identifying multiple incidents involving the malware. In one notable case from December 2025, Darktrace detected GhostSocks operating alongside Lumma Stealer, reinforcing that the partnership between Lumma and GhostSocks remains active despite recent attempts to disrupt Lumma’s infrastructure.

Darktrace’s first detection of GhostSocks‑related activity came when a device on the network of a customer in the education sector began making connections to an endpoint with a suspicious self‑signed certificate that had never been seen on the network before.

The endpoint in question, 159.89.46[.]92 with the hostname retreaw[.]click, has been flagged by multiple open‑source intelligence (OSINT) sources as being associated with Lumma Stealer’s C2 infrastructure [2], indicating its likely role in the delivery of malicious payloads.

Darktrace’s detection of suspicious SSL connections to retreaw[.]click, indicating an attempted link to Lumma C2 infrastructure.
Figure 1: Darktrace’s detection of suspicious SSL connections to retreaw[.]click, indicating an attempted link to Lumma C2 infrastructure.

Less than two minutes later, Darktrace observed the same device downloading the executable (.exe) file “Renewable.exe” from the IP 86.54.24[.]29, which Darktrace recognized as 100% rare for this network.

Darktrace’s detection of a device downloading the unusual executable file “Renewable.exe”.
Figure 2: Darktrace’s detection of a device downloading the unusual executable file “Renewable.exe”.

Both the file MD5 hash and the executable itself have been identified by multiple OSINT vendors as being associated with the GhostSocks malware [3], with the executable likely the backdoor component of the GhostSocks malware, facilitating the distribution of additional malicious payloads [4].

Following this detection, Darktrace’s Autonomous Response capability recommended a blocking action for the device in an early attempt to stop the malicious file download. In this instance, Darktrace was configured in Human Confirmation Mode, meaning the customer’s security team was required to manually apply any mitigative response actions. Had Autonomous Response been fully enabled at the time of the attack, the connections to 86.54.24[.]29 would have been blocked, rendering the malware ineffective at reaching its C2 infrastructure and halting any further malicious communication.

 Darktrace’s Autonomous Response capability suggesting blocking the suspicious connections to the unusual endpoint from which the malicious executable was downloaded.
Figure 3: Darktrace’s Autonomous Response capability suggesting blocking the suspicious connections to the unusual endpoint from which the malicious executable was downloaded.

As the attack was able to progress, two days later the device was detected downloading additional payloads from the endpoint www.lbfs[.]site (23.106.58[.]48), including “Setup.exe”, “,.exe”, and “/vp6c63yoz.exe”.

Darktrace’s detection of a malicious payload being downloaded from the endpoint www.lbfs[.]site.
Figure 4: Darktrace’s detection of a malicious payload being downloaded from the endpoint www.lbfs[.]site.

Once again, Darktrace recognized the anomalous nature of these downloads and suggested that a “group pattern of life” be enforced on the offending device in an attempt to contain the activity. By enforcing a pattern of life on a device, Darktrace restricts its activity to connections and behaviors similar to those performed by peer devices within the same group, while still allowing it to carry out its expected activity, effectively preventing deviations indicative of compromise while minimizing disruption. As mentioned earlier, these mitigative actions required manual implementation, so the activity was able to continue. Darktrace proceeded to suggest further actions to contain subsequent malicious downloads, including an attempt to block all outbound traffic to stop the attack from progressing.

An overview of download activity and the Autonomous Response actions recommended by Darktrace to block the downloads.
Figure 5: An overview of download activity and the Autonomous Response actions recommended by Darktrace to block the downloads.

Around the same time, a third executable download was detected, this time from the hostname hxxp[://]d2ihv8ymzp14lr.cloudfront.net/2021-08-19/udppump[.]exe, along with the file “udppump.exe”.While GhostSocks may have been present only to facilitate the delivery of additional payloads, there is no indication that these CloudFront endpoints or files are functionally linked to GhostSocks. Rather, the evidence points to broader malicious file‑download activity.

Shortly after the multiple executable files had been downloaded, Darktrace observed the device initiating a series of repeated successful connections to several rare external endpoints, behavior consistent with early-stage C2 beaconing activity.

Cyber AI Analyst’s investigation

Darktrace’s detection of additional malicious file downloads from malicious CloudFront endpoints.
Figure 7: Darktrace’s detection of additional malicious file downloads from malicious CloudFront endpoints.

Throughout the course of this attack, Darktrace’s Cyber AI Analyst carried out its own autonomous investigation, piecing together seemingly separate events into one wider incident encompassing the first suspicious downloads beginning on December 4, the unusual connectivity to many suspicious IPs that followed, and the successful beaconing activity observed two days later. By analyzing these events in real-time and viewing them as part of the bigger picture, Cyber AI Analyst was able to construct an in‑depth breakdown of the attack to aid the customer’s investigation and remediation efforts.

Cyber AI Analyst investigation detailing the sequence of events on the compromised device, highlighting its extensive connectivity to rare endpoints, the related malicious file‑download activity, and finally the emergence of C2 beaconing behavior.
Figure 8: Cyber AI Analyst investigation detailing the sequence of events on the compromised device, highlighting its extensive connectivity to rare endpoints, the related malicious file‑download activity, and finally the emergence of C2 beaconing behavior.

Conclusion

The versatility offered by GhostSocks is far from new, but its ability to convert compromised devices into residential proxy nodes, while enabling long‑term, covert network access—illustrates how threat actors continue to maximise the value of their victims’ infrastructure. Its growing popularity, coupled with its ongoing partnership with Lumma, demonstrates that infrastructure takedowns alone are insufficient; as long as threat actors remain committed to maintaining anonymity and can rapidly rebuild their ecosystems, related malware activity is likely to persist in some form.

Credit to Isabel Evans (Cyber Analyst), Gernice Lee (Associate Principal Analyst & Regional Consultancy Lead – APJ)
Edited by Ryan Traill (Content Manager)

Appendices

References

1.    https://bloo.io/research/malware/ghostsocks

2.    https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/retreaw.click/community

3.    https://synthient.com/blog/ghostsocks-from-initial-access-to-residential-proxy

4.    https://www.joesandbox.com/analysis/1810568/0/html

5. https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/fab6525bf6e77249b74736cb74501a9491109dc7950688b3ae898354eb920413

Darktrace Model Detections

Real-time Detection Models

Anomalous Connection / Suspicious Self-Signed SSL

Anomalous Connection / Rare External SSL Self-Signed

Anomalous File / EXE from Rare External Location

Anomalous File / Multiple EXE from Rare External Locations

Compromise / Possible Fast Flux C2 Activity

Compromise / Large Number of Suspicious Successful Connections

Compromise / Large Number of Suspicious Failed Connections

Compromise / Sustained SSL or HTTP Increase

Autonomous Response Models

Antigena / Network / Significant Anomaly / Antigena Significant Anomaly from Client Block

Antigena / Network / External Threat / Antigena Suspicious File Block

Antigena / Network / Significant Anomaly / Antigena Controlled and Model Alert

Antigena / Network / External Threat / Antigena File then New Outbound Block

Antigena / Network / Significant Anomaly / Antigena Alerts Over Time Block

Antigena / Network / External Threat / Antigena Suspicious Activity Block

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Tactic – Technique – Sub-Technique

Resource Development – T1588 - Malware

Initial Access - T1189 - Drive-by Compromise

Persistence – T1112 – Modify Registry

Command and Control – T1071 – Application Layer Protocol

Command and Control – T1095 – Non-application Layer Protocol

Command and Control – T1071 – Web Protocols

Command and Control – T1571 – Non-Standard Port

Command and Control – T1102 – One-Way Communication

List of Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)

86.54.24[.]29 - IP - Likely GhostSocks C2

http[://]86.54.24[.]29/Renewable[.]exe - Hostname - GhostSocks Distribution Endpoint

http[://]d2ihv8ymzp14lr.cloudfront[.]net/2021-08-19/udppump[.]exe - CDN - Payload Distribution Endpoint

www.lbfs[.]site - Hostname - Likely C2 Endpoint

retreaw[.]click - Hostname - Lumma C2 Endpoint

alltipi[.]com - Hostname - Possible C2 Endpoint

w2.bruggebogeyed[.]site - Hostname - Possible C2 Endpoint

9b90c62299d4bed2e0752e2e1fc777ac50308534 - SHA1 file hash – Likely GhostSocks payload

3d9d7a7905e46a3e39a45405cb010c1baa735f9e - SHA1 file hash - Likely follow-up payload

10f928e00a1ed0181992a1e4771673566a02f4e3 - SHA1 file hash - Likely follow-up payload

Continue reading
About the author
Gernice Lee
Associate Principal Analyst & Regional Consultancy Lead

Blog

/

Email

/

March 24, 2026

Darktrace Unites Human Behavior and Threat Detection Across Email, Slack, Teams, and Zoom

Default blog imageDefault blog image

The communication attack surface is expanding

Modern attackers no longer focus solely on inboxes, they target people and the productivity systems where work actually happens. Meanwhile, the boundary between internal and external usage of tools is becoming blurrier everyday – turning the entire workplace into the attack surface. In 2025, identity compromise emerged as the single most consistent threat across the global threat landscape, as observed by Darktrace research across our entire customer base. Over 70% of incidents in the US involved SaaS/M365 account compromise and phishing or email-based social engineering, making credential abuse the single most effective initial access vector.

Despite this upward trend, investment in existing security awareness training (SAT) isn’t moving the needle on reducing risk. 84% of organizations still measure success through completion rates1, even though completion of standard training correlates with less than 2% real improvement in risky behavior.2 By prioritizing completion, organizations reward time spent rather than meaningful engagement, yet time in training doesn’t translate to retention or real-world decision-making. This compliance-first approach has left the workforce unprepared for the threats they actually face.

At the same time, attacks have evolved. Highly personalized, AI-generated campaigns now move fluidly across email, Slack, Teams, Zoom, and beyond, blending channels and even targeting systems directly through techniques like prompt injection. This new reality demands a different approach: one that treats people and the tools they use as a single ecosystem, where behavior and detection continuously inform and strengthen each other.

Only an adaptive communication security system can keep pace with the speed, creativity, and cross channel nature of today’s threats. 

Ushering in the adaptive era of workplace security

With this release, Darktrace brings together our new behavior-driven training solution with email detection, cross-channel visibility, and platform-level insights. Powered by Self-Learning AI, it delivers protection across both people and the communication tools they rely on every day, including email, Slack, Teams, and Zoom.

Each component learns from the others – training adapts to real user behavior, detection evolves across channels, and response is continuously refined – creating a powerful feedback loop that strengthens resilience and improves accuracy against today’s AI-driven threats.

Introducing: Unified training and email security for a self-improving email defense

Our brand new product, Darktrace / Adaptive Human Defense, closes the gap between human behavior and email security to continuously strengthen both people and defenses. Each user receives personalized training that adapts to their own inbox activity and skill level, with learning delivered directly within the flow of their day-to-day email interactions.

By learning from each user’s interactions with security training, it adapts security responses, creating a closed-loop system where training reinforces detection and detection informs training. Let’s look at some of the benefits.

  • Reduce successful phishing at the source with contextual Just in Time coaching: Contextual coaching appears directly in real email threads the moment risky behavior is detected, so habits change where mistakes actually happen. Configurable triggers and group policies target the right users, reducing repeated errors and administrative overhead.
  • Adaptive phishing simulations that progress automatically with each user: Embedded simulations vary in their degree of realism, from generic phishing to generative AI-enabled spear phishing. Users progress through the difficulty levels based on their performance to give an accurate picture of their phishing preparedness.  
  • Native email security integration turns human behavior into quantified risk: The native email security integration allows engagement, links clicked, and question success signals to flow back into / EMAIL recipes and models, so detection and response adapt automatically as users learn.  
  • Actionable risk and trend analytics beyond completion rates: Analytics that surface repeat offenders, high-value targets, and measurable exposure, moving beyond completion metrics to give leaders actionable insights tied to real behavior.

Learn more about / Adaptive Human Defense in the product solution brief.

Industry-first cross-channel full-message analysis for email, Slack, Teams, and Zoom

Darktrace now brings full-message analysis to Email, Slack, Teams, Zoom, and even generative AI prompts. The same leading behavioral analysis from EMAIL extends to every message, tracing intent, tone, relationships, and conversation flow across all communication activity for a complete understanding of every user interaction.

By correlating messaging and collaboration activity with email and account environments, cross-channel analysis reveals multi-domain attack paths and follows both users and threats as a single, continuous narrative – delivering better context to improve detection across the entire organization.

  • Eliminate cross-channel blind spots: Detect phishing, malware, account takeovers, and conversational manipulation across email and collaboration platforms, so attackers can’t exploit Slack, Teams, or Zoom as a new entry point. Unified behavioral analysis gives security teams a coherent, single view, for no more fragmented, channel-specific gaps.
  • Spot generative AI prompt injection attacks before they manipulate assistants: Dedicated models surface threats targeting corporate AI assistants – like ShadowLeak and Hashjack – before they can silently manipulate workflows, reducing risk before static filters catch up.

Learn more about Darktrace’s messaging security offering in the product solution brief.

Industry-first DMARC with bi-directional ASM and email security integration

Darktrace transforms domain protection by linking DMARC, attack surface intelligence, and email security into a single, continuously evolving workflow. Instead of treating domain authentication and exposure as separate tasks, this unified approach shows not just where domains are vulnerable, but how attackers are actively exploiting them.

  • Fix authentication weaknesses faster: SPF, DKIM, DMARC configurations, and external exposure data are analyzed together, giving teams clear guidance to correct weaknesses before they can be abused. Deep bidirectional integration with attack surface intelligence reduces impersonation risk at the source.
  • Accelerate email investigations: DMARC context is embedded directly into email workflows, enriching triage with authentication posture, internal/external sender lists, and seamless pivots between email and domain intelligence for faster, more accurate investigations.

Committed to innovation

These updates are part of a broader Darktrace release, which also includes:

Join our Live Launch Event on April 14, 2026.

Join us for an exclusive announcement event where Darktrace, the leader in AI-native cybersecurity, will be announcing our latest innovations, including  a demo of our new product / Adaptive Human Defense, an exclusive conversation with a Darktrace customer, and a deep dive into the Darktrace ActiveAI Security Portal.  

Register here.

References

[1] 84% of organizations still measure security awareness training success through completion rates, a vanity metric with no correlation to behavior change. (Source:  NIST Awareness Effectiveness Study, Forrester 2025)

[2] 'Limited benefit from embedded phishing training. Using randomized controlled trials and statistical modeling, embedded training provides a statistically-significant reduction in average failure rate, but of only 2%.' Ho, G., Mirian, A., Luo, E., Tong, K., Lee, E., Liu, L., Longhurst, C. A., Dameff, C., Savage, S., & Voelker, G. M. (2025). Understanding the Efficacy of Phishing Training in Practice. Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.

Continue reading
About the author
Carlos Gray
Senior Product Marketing Manager, Email
あなたのデータ × DarktraceのAI
唯一無二のDarktrace AIで、ネットワークセキュリティを次の次元へ