ブログ
/
/
May 31, 2021

Exploiting Compliance: Ransomware Gang Tactics

Understand the methods ransomware gangs use to exploit security compliance and how Darktrace's AI can mitigate these threats.
No items found.
Inside the SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
No items found.
Default blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog image
31
May 2021

Compliance regulations like CCPA and GDPR are created with good intentions. They aim to secure user data, ensure privacy, and build trust between the companies and consumers. However, these regulations have become a double-edged sword for many organizations.

One reason for this is the rise of double extortion ransomware, where data is exfiltrated before files are encrypted. In this scenario, threat actors threaten to release sensitive company information online if the ransom is not paid. Companies can face hefty fines if they fail to comply with regulation, and thus they are pressured into paying the ransom just to keep the breach quiet.

Consequences of non-compliance

Today’s businesses face a range of demanding privacy regulations that are frequently being updated. This includes General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, and regulations from the New York State Department Of Financial Services, or NYDFS.

With the shift to remote and dynamic working, and the ever-increasing complexity of business operations, there has been great pressure for companies to upgrade infrastructure and ensure that they are meeting all regulations.

Non-compliance can lead to significant financial penalties and drawn-out legal actions. If organizations fail to protect their data, the fees can be disastrous. GDPR can fine companies up to €20 million, or 4% of a company’s annual global turnover. For example, since 2017, Google has been fined a combined total of $9.5 billion by EU regulators.

Weaponization of compliance

Ultimately, compliance serves the important purpose of giving citizens more control and rights over their data. However, cyber-criminals have realized that they can use the threat of non-compliance as a pressure point against organizations. Stolen data, if released to the public, can lead to huge regulatory fines.

We have seen this phenomenon in double extortion ransomware attacks, where threat actors steal sensitive data before they encrypt the files. Moreover, several ransomware actors, such as the Babuk gang, now have begun to forsake encryption in favor of extortion. This is because threat actors realize that exfiltration is more effective when many organizations continually back up files as a precaution against the threat of ransomware locking down files.

Ransomware actors often auction intellectual property, customer data, and company secrets on the Dark Web. The Maze ransomware group established this trend back when it created a website in late 2019 to publicly ‘name and shame’ organizations that had been compromised. These attacks included theft of information such as stolen PDF files, in addition to IP addresses and device names which were then uploaded and made publicly available on its website.

Over 70% of ransomware attacks now involve exfiltration.

The tactic was made infamous by the cyber-criminal group REvil, who publicly announced their intentions on a Russian hacker forum in December 2019:

“Each attack is accompanied by a copy of commercial information. In case of refusal of payment, the data will either be sold to competitors or laid out in open sources. GDPR. Do not want to pay us – pay x10 more to the government. No problems.”

In these cases, threat actors are essentially saying, ‘if you pay us this small ransom, we will keep your data safe. If you don’t pay us, we have the power to release your data, and then you can take your chances with a huge compliance fine.’

Organizations may prefer to negotiate with cyber-criminals and keep the breach – or threat of breach – quiet. This is what the ransomware attackers are banking on.

How AI can help: Stopping ransomware and strengthening compliance

Compliance fines are not cheap. It took over three years of legal proceedings for Equifax to settle their 2017 data breach. They finally settled with paying $700 million to regulators, including the Federal Trade Commission and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Home Depot and Uber have also famously faced financial penalties of hundreds of millions of dollars.

These regulatory fines are compounding the potential consequences of ransomware. The continued ability of attackers to adapt and find new weaknesses means that it is crucial for companies to identify and contain ransomware in its earliest stages, with machine speed and precision.

Darktrace’s AI has achieved this repeatedly, such as when a WastedLocker intrusion was stopped before the ransomware was deployed. By constantly evolving its understanding of the organization, Cyber AI detects and automatically investigates all unusual activity across the enterprise and can respond autonomously in real time to stop threats in their tracks.

Figure 1: Darktrace’s customizable CCPA tags allow for specialized alerting on activity related to personal data as defined by CCPA

Furthermore, Darktrace’s technology can be used to action specific types of alerts based on different compliance threat models. For instance, businesses seeking to ensure compliance with CCPA requirements can use a specific ‘CCPA Tag’ for certain devices which have, or are likely to have, consumer data subject to the CCPA. When relevant data from the tagged devices leaves the environment or is involved in any abnormal activity, Darktrace’s AI detects this immediately and automatically launches an investigation into the incident.

With a proven ability to protect against machine-speed threats, and the ability to strengthen compliance with customizable alerts, the Darktrace Immune System platform provides a powerful defense against double extortion ransomware.

Under pressure

Compliance is just one of the many strategic concerns facing ransomware victims. In addition to customer trust, valuable IP, and long-term reputation, attackers and defenders are in a constant ‘cat and mouse’ game, such that threat actors will continue to seek out new pressure points to extort their targets.

Figure 2: Current varieties of double extortion ransomware

Organizations accordingly will benefit from using sophisticated technologies that neutralize ransomware before it has encrypted or exfiltrated files, stopping advanced threats in their earliest stages.

No items found.
Inside the SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
No items found.

More in this series

No items found.

Blog

/

Cloud

/

March 5, 2026

Inside Cloud Compromise: Investigating Attacker Activity with Darktrace / Forensic Acquisition & Investigation

Default blog imageDefault blog image

Investigating Cloud Attacks with Forensic Acquisition & Investigation

Darktrace / Forensic Acquisition & Investigation™ is the industry’s first truly automated forensic solution purpose-built for the cloud. This blog will demonstrate how an investigation can be carried out against a compromised cloud server in minutes, rather than hours or days.

The compromised server investigated in this case originates from Darktrace’s Cloudypots system, a global honeypot network designed to observe adversary activity in real time across a wide range of cloud services. Whenever an attacker successfully compromises one of these honeypots, a forensic copy of the virtual server's disk is preserved for later analysis. Using Forensic Acquisition & Investigation, analysts can then investigate further and obtain detailed insights into the compromise including complete attacker timelines and root cause analysis.

Forensic Acquisition & Investigation supports importing artifacts from a variety of sources, including EC2 instances, ECS, S3 buckets, and more. The Cloudypots system produces a raw disk image whenever an attack is detected and stores it in an S3 bucket. This allows the image to be directly imported into Forensic Acquisition & Investigation using the S3 bucket import option.

As Forensic Acquisition & Investigation runs cloud-natively, no additional configuration is required to add a specific S3 bucket. Analysts can browse and acquire forensic assets from any bucket that the configured IAM role is permitted to access. Operators can also add additional IAM credentials, including those from other cloud providers, to extend access across multiple cloud accounts and environments.

Figure 1: Forensic Acquisition & Investigation import screen.

Forensic Acquisition & Investigation then retrieves a copy of the file and automatically begins running the analysis pipeline on the artifact. This pipeline performs a full forensic analysis of the disk and builds a timeline of the activity that took place on the compromised asset. By leveraging Forensic Acquisition & Investigation’s cloud-native analysis system, this process condenses hour of manual work into just minutes.

Successful import of a forensic artifact and initiation of the analysis pipeline.
Figure 2: Successful import of a forensic artifact and initiation of the analysis pipeline.

Once processing is complete, the preserved artifact is visible in the Evidence tab, along with a summary of key information obtained during analysis, such as the compromised asset’s hostname, operating system, cloud provider, and key event count.

The Evidence overview showing the acquired disk image.
Figure 3: The Evidence overview showing the acquired disk image.

Clicking on the “Key events” field in the listing opens the timeline view, automatically filtered to show system- generated alarms.

The timeline provides a chronological record of every event that occurred on the system, derived from multiple sources, including:

  • Parsed log files such as the systemd journal, audit logs, application specific logs, and others.
  • Parsed history files such as .bash_history, allowing executed commands to be shown on the timeline.
  • File-specific events, such as files being created, accessed, modified, or executables being run, etc.

This approach allows timestamped information and events from multiple sources to be aggregated and parsed into a single, concise view, greatly simplifying the data review process.

Alarms are created for specific timeline events that match either a built-in system rule, curated by Darktrace’s Threat Research team or an operator-defined created at the project level. These alarms help quickly filter out noise and highlight on events of interest, such as the creation of a file containing known malware, access to sensitive files like Amazon Web Service (AWS) credentials, suspicious arguments or commands, and more.

 The timeline view filtered to alarm_severity: “1” OR alarm_severity: “3”, showing only events that matched an alarm rule.
Figure 4: The timeline view filtered to alarm_severity: “1” OR alarm_severity: “3”, showing only events that matched an alarm rule.

In this case, several alarms were generated for suspicious Base64 arguments being passed to Selenium. Examining the event data, it appears the attacker spawned a Selenium Grid session with the following payload:

"request.payload": "[Capabilities {browserName: chrome, goog:chromeOptions: {args: [-cimport base64;exec(base64...], binary: /usr/bin/python3, extensions: []}, pageLoadStrategy: normal}]"

This is a common attack vector for Selenium Grid. The chromeOptions object is intended to specify arguments for how Google Chrome should be launched; however, in this case the attacker has abused the binary field to execute the Python3 binary instead of Chrome. Combined with the option to specify command-line arguments, the attacker can use Python3’s -c option to execute arbitrary Python code, in this instance, decoding and executing a Base64 payload.

Selenium’s logs truncate the Arguments field automatically, so an alternate method is required to retrieve the full payload. To do this, the search bar can be used to find all events that occurred around the same time as this flagged event.

Pivoting off the previous event by filtering the timeline to events within the same window using timestamp: [“2026-02-18T09:09:00Z” TO “2026-02-18T09:12:00Z”].
Figure 5: Pivoting off the previous event by filtering the timeline to events within the same window using timestamp: [“2026-02-18T09:09:00Z” TO “2026-02-18T09:12:00Z”].

Scrolling through the search results, an entry from Java’s systemd journal can be identified. This log contains the full, unaltered payload. GCHQ’s CyberChef can then be used to decode the Base64 data into the attacker’s script, which will ultimately be executed.[NJ9]

Continue reading
About the author
Nathaniel Bill
Malware Research Engineer

Blog

/

Network

/

February 19, 2026

CVE-2026-1731: How Darktrace Sees the BeyondTrust Exploitation Wave Unfolding

Default blog imageDefault blog image

Note: Darktrace's Threat Research team is publishing now to help defenders. We will continue updating this blog as our investigations unfold.

Background

On February 6, 2026, the Identity & Access Management solution BeyondTrust announced patches for a vulnerability, CVE-2026-1731, which enables unauthenticated remote code execution using specially crafted requests.  This vulnerability affects BeyondTrust Remote Support (RS) and particular older versions of Privileged Remote Access (PRA) [1].

A Proof of Concept (PoC) exploit for this vulnerability was released publicly on February 10, and open-source intelligence (OSINT) reported exploitation attempts within 24 hours [2].

Previous intrusions against Beyond Trust technology have been cited as being affiliated with nation-state attacks, including a 2024 breach targeting the U.S. Treasury Department. This incident led to subsequent emergency directives from  the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and later showed attackers had chained previously unknown vulnerabilities to achieve their goals [3].

Additionally, there appears to be infrastructure overlap with React2Shell mass exploitation previously observed by Darktrace, with command-and-control (C2) domain  avg.domaininfo[.]top seen in potential post-exploitation activity for BeyondTrust, as well as in a React2Shell exploitation case involving possible EtherRAT deployment.

Darktrace Detections

Darktrace’s Threat Research team has identified highly anomalous activity across several customers that may relate to exploitation of BeyondTrust since February 10, 2026. Observed activities include:

Outbound connections and DNS requests for endpoints associated with Out-of-Band Application Security Testing; these services are commonly abused by threat actors for exploit validation.  Associated Darktrace models include:

  • Compromise / Possible Tunnelling to Bin Services

Suspicious executable file downloads. Associated Darktrace models include:

  • Anomalous File / EXE from Rare External Location

Outbound beaconing to rare domains. Associated Darktrace models include:

  • Compromise / Agent Beacon (Medium Period)
  • Compromise / Agent Beacon (Long Period)
  • Compromise / Sustained TCP Beaconing Activity To Rare Endpoint
  • Compromise / Beacon to Young Endpoint
  • Anomalous Server Activity / Rare External from Server
  • Compromise / SSL Beaconing to Rare Destination

Unusual cryptocurrency mining activity. Associated Darktrace models include:

  • Compromise / Monero Mining
  • Compromise / High Priority Crypto Currency Mining

And model alerts for:

  • Compromise / Rare Domain Pointing to Internal IP

IT Defenders: As part of best practices, we highly recommend employing an automated containment solution in your environment. For Darktrace customers, please ensure that Autonomous Response is configured correctly. More guidance regarding this activity and suggested actions can be found in the Darktrace Customer Portal.  

Appendices

Potential indicators of post-exploitation behavior:

·      217.76.57[.]78 – IP address - Likely C2 server

·      hXXp://217.76.57[.]78:8009/index.js - URL -  Likely payload

·      b6a15e1f2f3e1f651a5ad4a18ce39d411d385ac7  - SHA1 - Likely payload

·      195.154.119[.]194 – IP address – Likely C2 server

·      hXXp://195.154.119[.]194/index.js - URL – Likely payload

·      avg.domaininfo[.]top – Hostname – Likely C2 server

·      104.234.174[.]5 – IP address - Possible C2 server

·      35da45aeca4701764eb49185b11ef23432f7162a – SHA1 – Possible payload

·      hXXp://134.122.13[.]34:8979/c - URL – Possible payload

·      134.122.13[.]34 – IP address – Possible C2 server

·      28df16894a6732919c650cc5a3de94e434a81d80 - SHA1 - Possible payload

References:

1.        https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1731

2.        https://www.securityweek.com/beyondtrust-vulnerability-targeted-by-hackers-within-24-hours-of-poc-release/

3.        https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-cve-2026-1731-critical-unauthenticated-remote-code-execution-rce-beyondtrust-remote-support-rs-privileged-remote-access-pra/

Continue reading
About the author
Emma Foulger
Global Threat Research Operations Lead
あなたのデータ × DarktraceのAI
唯一無二のDarktrace AIで、ネットワークセキュリティを次の次元へ