Blog
/
AI
/
April 16, 2025

Force Multiply Your Security Team with Agentic AI: How the Industry’s Only True Cyber AI Analyst™ Saves Time and Stop Threats

See how Darktrace Cyber AI Analyst™, an agentic AI virtual analyst, cuts through alert noise, accelerates threat response, and strengthens your security team — all without adding headcount.
Inside the SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
Written by
Ed Metcalf
Senior Director of Product Marketing, AI & Innovation Products
Team collaborating in work spaceDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog image
16
Apr 2025

With 90million investigations in 2024 alone, Darktrace Cyber AI Analyst TM is transforming security operations with AI and has added up to 30 Full Time Security Analysts to almost 10,000 security teams.

In today’s high-stakes threat landscape, security teams are overwhelmed — stretched thin by burnout, alert fatigue, and a constant barrage of fast-moving attacks. As traditional tools can’t keep up, many are turning to AI to solve these challenges. But not all AI is created equal, and no single type of AI can perform all the functions necessary to effectively streamline security operations, safeguard your organization and rapidly respond to threats.

Thus, a multi-layered AI approach is critical to enhance threat detection, investigation, and response and augment security teams. By leveraging multiple AI methods, such as machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing, security systems become more adaptive and resilient, capable of identifying and mitigating complex cyber threats in real time. This comprehensive approach ensures that no single AI method's limitations compromise the overall security posture, providing a robust defense against evolving threats.

As leaders in AI in cybersecurity, Darktrace has been utilizing a multi-layered AI approach for years, strategically combining and layering a range of AI techniques to provide better security outcomes. One key component of this is our Cyber AI Analyst – a sophisticated agentic AI system that avoids the pitfalls of generative AI. This approach ensures expeditious and scalable investigation and analysis, accurate threat detection and rapid automated response, empowering security teams to stay ahead of today's sophisticated cyber threats.

In this blog we will explore:

  • What agentic AI is and why security teams are adopting it to deliver a set of critical functions needed in cybersecurity
  • How Darktrace’s Cyber AI AnalystTM is a sophisticated agentic AI system that uses a multi-layered AI approach to achieve better security outcomes and enhance SOC analysts
  • Introduce two new innovative machine learning models that further augment Cyber AI Analyst’s investigation and evaluation capabilities

The rise of agentic AI

To combat the overwhelming volume of alerts, the shortage of security professionals, and burnout, security teams need AI that can perform complex tasks without human intervention, also known as agentic AI. The ability of these systems to act autonomously can significantly improve efficiency and effectiveness. However, many attempts to implement agentic AI rely on generative AI, which has notable drawbacks.

Broadly speaking, agentic AI refers to artificial intelligence systems that act autonomously as "agents," capable of carrying out complex tasks, making decisions, and interacting with tools or external systems with no or limited human intervention. Unlike traditional AI models that perform predefined tasks, it uses advanced techniques to mimic human decision-making processes, dynamically adapting to new challenges and responding to varied inputs. In a narrower definition, agentic AI often uses generative large language models (LLMs) as its core, using this to plan tasks and interactions with other systems, iteratively feeding its output into its input to accomplish more tasks than are traditionally possible with a single prompt. When described in terms of technology rather than functionality, agentic AI would be deemed as AI using this kind of generative system.

In cybersecurity, agentic AI systems can be used to autonomously monitor traffic, identify unusual patterns or anomalies indicating potential threats, and take action to respond to these possible attacks. For example, they can handle incident response tasks such as isolating affected systems or patching vulnerabilities, and triaging alerts. This reduces the reliance on human analysts for routine tasks, allowing them to focus on high-priority incidents and strategic initiatives, thereby increasing the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the SOC.

Despite their potential, agentic AI systems with a generative AI core have notable limitations. Whether based on widely used foundation models or fully custom proprietary implementations, generative AI often struggles with poor reasoning and can produce incorrect conclusions. These models are prone to "hallucinations," where they generate false information, which can be magnified through iterative processes. Additionally, generative AI systems are particularly susceptible to inheriting biases from training data, leading to incorrect outcomes, and are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, such as prompt injection that manipulates the AI's decision-making process.

Thus, choosing the right agentic AI system is crucial for security teams to ensure accurate threat detection, streamline investigations, and minimize false positives. It's essential to look beyond generative AI-based systems, which can lead to false positives and missed threats, and adopt AI that integrates multiple techniques. By considering AI systems that leverage a variety of advanced methods, organizations can build a more robust and comprehensive security strategy.  

Industry’s most experienced agentic AI analyst

First introduced in 2019, Darktrace Cyber AI AnalystTM emerged as a groundbreaking, patented solution in the cybersecurity landscape. As the most experienced AI Analyst deployed to almost 10,000 customers worldwide, Cyber AI Analyst is a sophisticated example of agentic AI, aligning closely with our broad definition. Unlike generative AI-based systems, it uses a multi-layered AI approach - strategically combining and layering various AI techniques, both in parallel and sequentially – to autonomously investigate and triage alerts with speed and precision that outpaces human teams. By utilizing a diverse set of AI methods, including unsupervised machine learning, models trained on expert cyber analysts, and custom security-specific large language models, Cyber AI Analyst mirrors human investigative processes by questioning data, testing hypotheses, and reaching conclusions at machine speed and scale. It integrates data from various sources – including network, cloud, email, OT and even third-party alerts – to identify threats and execute appropriate responses without human input, ensuring accurate and reliable decision-making.

With its ability to learn and adapt using Darktrace's unique understanding of an organization’s environment, Cyber AI Analyst highlights anomalies and passes only the most relevant activity to human users. Every investigation is thoroughly explained with natural language summaries, providing transparent and interpretable AI insights. Unlike generative AI-based agentic systems, Cyber AI Analyst's outputs are based on a comprehensive understanding of the underlying data, avoiding inaccuracies and "hallucinations," thereby dramatically reducing risk of false positives.

90 million investigations. Zero burnout.

Building on six years of innovation since launch, Darktrace's Cyber AI Analyst continues to revolutionize security operations by automating time-consuming tasks and enabling teams to focus on strategic initiatives. In 2024 alone, the sophisticated AI system autonomously conducted 90 million investigations, its analysis and correlation during these investigations resulted in escalating just 3 million incidents for human validation and resulting in fewer than 500,000 incidents deemed critical to the security of the organization. This completely changed the security operations process, providing customers with an ability to investigate every relevant alert as an unprecedented alternative to detection engineering that avoids massive quantities of risk from the traditional approach.  Cyber AI Analyst performed the equivalent of 42 million hours of human investigation for relevant security alerts.

The benefits of Cyber AI Analyst will transform security operations as we know it today:

  • Autonomously investigates thousands of alerts, distilling them into a few critical incidents — saving security teams thousands of hours and removing risk from current “triage few” processes. [See how the State of Oklahoma gained 2,561 hours of investigation time and eliminated 3,142 alerts in 3 months]
  • It decreases critical incident discoverability from hours to minutes, enabling security teams to respond faster to potential threats that will severely impact their organization. Learn how South Coast Water District went from hours to minutes in incident discovery.
  • It reduces false positives by 90%, giving security teams confidence in its accuracy and output.
  • Delivers the output of up to 30 full-time analysts – without the cost, burnout, or ramp-up time, while elevating existing human security analysts to validation and response

Cyber AI Analyst allows security teams to allocate their resources more effectively, focusing on genuine threats rather than sifting through noise. This not only enhances productivity but also ensures that critical alerts are addressed promptly, minimizing potential damage and improving overall cyber resilience.

Always innovating - Next-generation AI models for cybersecurity

As empowering defenders with AI has never been more critical, Darktrace remains committed to driving innovation that helps our customers proactively reduce risk, strengthen their security posture, and uplift their teams. To further enhance security teams, Darktrace is introducing two next-generation AI models for cybersecurity within Cyber AI Analyst, including:

  • Darktrace Incident Graph Evaluation for Security Threats (DIGEST): Using graph neural networks, this model analyzes how attacks progress to predict which threats are likely to escalate — giving your team earlier warnings and sharper prioritization.  This means earlier warnings, better prioritization, and fewer surprises during active threats.
  • Darktrace Embedding Model for Investigation of Security Threats - Version 2 (DEMIST-2): This new language model is purpose-built for cybersecurity. With deep contextual understanding, it automates critical human-like analysis— like assessing hostnames, file sensitivity, and tracking users across environments. Unlike large general-purpose models, it delivers superior performance with a smaller footprint. Working across all our deployment types, including on-prem and cloud, it can run without internet access, keeping inference local.

Unlike the foundational LLMs that power many generative and agentic systems, these models are purpose-built for cybersecurity, supported by insights of over 200 security analysts and is capable of mimicking how an analyst thinks, to bring AI-based precision and depth of analysis into the SOC. By understanding how attacks evolve and predicting which threats are most likely to escalate, these machine learning models enable Cyber AI AnalystTM to provide earlier detection, sharper prioritization, and faster, more confident decision-making.

Conclusion

Darktrace Cyber AI AnalystTM redefines security operations with proven agentic AI — delivering autonomous investigations and faster response times, while significantly reducing false positives. With powerful new models like DIGEST and DEMIST-2, it empowers security teams to prioritize what matters, cut through noise, and stay ahead of evolving threats — all without additional headcount. As cyber risk grows, Cyber AI Analyst stands out as a force multiplier, driving efficiency, resilience, and confidence in every SOC.

[related-resource]

Additional resources

Learn more about Cyber AI Analyst

Explore the solution brief, learn how Cyber AI Analyst combines advanced AI techniques to deliver faster, more effective security outcomes

Inside the SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
Written by
Ed Metcalf
Senior Director of Product Marketing, AI & Innovation Products

More in this series

No items found.

Blog

/

/

April 24, 2025

The Importance of NDR in Resilient XDR

picture of hands typing on laptop Default blog imageDefault blog image

As threat actors become more adept at targeting and disabling EDR agents, relying solely on endpoint detection leaves critical blind spots.

Network detection and response (NDR) offers the visibility and resilience needed to catch what EDR can’t especially in environments with unmanaged devices or advanced threats that evade local controls.

This blog explores how threat actors can disable or bypass EDR-based XDR solutions and demonstrates how Darktrace’s approach to NDR closes the resulting security gaps with Self-Learning AI that enables autonomous, real-time detection and response.

Threat actors see local security agents as targets

Recent research by security firms has highlighted ‘EDR killers’: tools that deliberately target EDR agents to disable or damage them. These include the known malicious tool EDRKillShifter, the open source EDRSilencer, EDRSandblast and variants of Terminator, and even the legitimate business application HRSword.

The attack surface of any endpoint agent is inevitably large, whether the software is challenged directly, by contesting its local visibility and access mechanisms, or by targeting the Operating System it relies upon. Additionally, threat actors can readily access and analyze EDR tools, and due to their uniformity across environments an exploit proven in a lab setting will likely succeed elsewhere.

Sophos have performed deep research into the EDRShiftKiller tool, which ESET have separately shown became accessible to multiple threat actor groups. Cisco Talos have reported via TheRegister observing significant success rates when an EDR kill was attempted by ransomware actors.

With the local EDR agent silently disabled or evaded, how will the threat be discovered?

What are the limitations of relying solely on EDR?

Cyber attackers will inevitably break through boundary defences, through innovation or trickery or exploiting zero-days. Preventive measures can reduce but not completely stop this. The attackers will always then want to expand beyond their initial access point to achieve persistence and discover and reach high value targets within the business. This is the primary domain of network activity monitoring and NDR, which includes responsibility for securing the many devices that cannot run endpoint agents.

In the insights from a CISA Red Team assessment of a US CNI organization, the Red Team was able to maintain access over the course of months and achieve their target outcomes. The top lesson learned in the report was:

“The assessed organization had insufficient technical controls to prevent and detect malicious activity. The organization relied too heavily on host-based endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions and did not implement sufficient network layer protections.”

This proves that partial, isolated viewpoints are not sufficient to track and analyze what is fundamentally a connected problem – and without the added visibility and detection capabilities of NDR, any downstream SIEM or MDR services also still have nothing to work with.

Why is network detection & response (NDR) critical?

An effective NDR finds threats that disable or can’t be seen by local security agents and generally operates out-of-band, acquiring data from infrastructure such as traffic mirroring from physical or virtual switches. This means that the security system is extremely inaccessible to a threat actor at any stage.

An advanced NDR such as Darktrace / NETWORK is fully capable of detecting even high-end novel and unknown threats.

Detecting exploitation of Ivanti CS/PS with Darktrace / NETWORK

On January 9th 2025, two new vulnerabilities were disclosed in Ivanti Connect Secure and Policy Secure appliances that were under malicious exploitation. Perimeter devices, like Ivanti VPNs, are designed to keep threat actors out of a network, so it's quite serious when these devices are vulnerable.

An NDR solution is critical because it provides network-wide visibility for detecting lateral movement and threats that an EDR might miss, such as identifying command and control sessions (C2) and data exfiltration, even when hidden within encrypted traffic and which an EDR alone may not detect.

Darktrace initially detected suspicious activity connected with the exploitation of CVE-2025-0282 on December 29, 2024 – 11 days before the public disclosure of the vulnerability, this early detection highlights the benefits of an anomaly-based network detection method.

Throughout the campaign and based on the network telemetry available to Darktrace, a wide range of malicious activities were identified, including the malicious use of administrative credentials, the download of suspicious files, and network scanning in the cases investigated.

Darktrace / NETWORK’s autonomous response capabilities played a critical role in containment by autonomously blocking suspicious connections and enforcing normal behavior patterns. At the same time, Darktrace Cyber AI Analyst™ automatically investigated and correlated the anomalous activity into cohesive incidents, revealing the full scope of the compromise.

This case highlights the importance of real-time, AI-driven network monitoring to detect and disrupt stealthy post-exploitation techniques targeting unmanaged or unprotected systems.

Unlocking adaptive protection for evolving cyber risks

Darktrace / NETWORK uses unique AI engines that learn what is normal behavior for an organization’s entire network, continuously analyzing, mapping and modeling every connection to create a full picture of your devices, identities, connections, and potential attack paths.

With its ability to uncover previously unknown threats as well as detect known threats using signatures and threat intelligence, Darktrace is an essential layer of the security stack. Darktrace has helped secure customers against attacks including 2024 threat actor campaigns against Fortinet’s FortiManager , Palo Alto firewall devices, and more.  

Stay tuned for part II of this series which dives deeper into the differences between NDR types.

Credit to Nathaniel Jones VP, Security & AI Strategy, FCISO & Ashanka Iddya, Senior Director of Product Marketing for their contribution to this blog.

Continue reading
About the author
Nathaniel Jones
VP, Security & AI Strategy, Field CISO

Blog

/

/

April 22, 2025

Obfuscation Overdrive: Next-Gen Cryptojacking with Layers

man looking at multiple computer screensDefault blog imageDefault blog image

Out of all the services honeypotted by Darktrace, Docker is the most commonly attacked, with new strains of malware emerging daily. This blog will analyze a novel malware campaign with a unique obfuscation technique and a new cryptojacking technique.

What is obfuscation?

Obfuscation is a common technique employed by threat actors to prevent signature-based detection of their code, and to make analysis more difficult. This novel campaign uses an interesting technique of obfuscating its payload.

Docker image analysis

The attack begins with a request to launch a container from Docker Hub, specifically the kazutod/tene:ten image. Using Docker Hub’s layer viewer, an analyst can quickly identify what the container is designed to do. In this case, the container is designed to run the ten.py script which is built into itself.

 Docker Hub Image Layers, referencing the script ten.py.
Figure 1: Docker Hub Image Layers, referencing the script ten.py.

To gain more information on the Python file, Docker’s built in tooling can be used to download the image (docker pull kazutod/tene:ten) and then save it into a format that is easier to work with (docker image save kazutod/tene:ten -o tene.tar). It can then be extracted as a regular tar file for further investigation.

Extraction of the resulting tar file.
Figure 2: Extraction of the resulting tar file.

The Docker image uses the OCI format, which is a little different to a regular file system. Instead of having a static folder of files, the image consists of layers. Indeed, when running the file command over the sha256 directory, each layer is shown as a tar file, along with a JSON metadata file.

Output of the file command over the sha256 directory.
Figure 3: Output of the file command over the sha256 directory.

As the detailed layers are not necessary for analysis, a single command can be used to extract all of them into a single directory, recreating what the container file system would look like:

find blobs/sha256 -type f -exec sh -c 'file "{}" | grep -q "tar archive" && tar -xf "{}" -C root_dir' \;

Result of running the command above.
Figure 4: Result of running the command above.

The find command can then be used to quickly locate where the ten.py script is.

find root_dir -name ten.py

root_dir/app/ten.py

Details of the above ten.py script.
Figure 5: Details of the above ten.py script.

This may look complicated at first glance, however after breaking it down, it is fairly simple. The script defines a lambda function (effectively a variable that contains executable code) and runs zlib decompress on the output of base64 decode, which is run on the reversed input. The script then runs the lambda function with an input of the base64 string, and then passes it to exec, which runs the decoded string as Python code.

To help illustrate this, the code can be cleaned up to this simplified function:

def decode(input):
   reversed = input[::-1]

   decoded = base64.decode(reversed)
   decompressed = zlib.decompress(decoded)
   return decompressed

decoded_string = decode(the_big_text_blob)
exec(decoded_string) # run the decoded string

This can then be set up as a recipe in Cyberchef, an online tool for data manipulation, to decode it.

Use of Cyberchef to decode the ten.py script.
Figure 6: Use of Cyberchef to decode the ten.py script.

The decoded payload calls the decode function again and puts the output into exec. Copy and pasting the new payload into the input shows that it does this another time. Instead of copy-pasting the output into the input all day, a quick script can be used to decode this.

The script below uses the decode function from earlier in order to decode the base64 data and then uses some simple string manipulation to get to the next payload. The script will run this over and over until something interesting happens.

# Decode the initial base64

decoded = decode(initial)
# Remove the first 11 characters and last 3

# so we just have the next base64 string

clamped = decoded[11:-3]

for i in range(1, 100):
   # Decode the new payload

   decoded = decode(clamped)
   # Print it with the current step so we

   # can see what’s going on

   print(f"Step {i}")

   print(decoded)
   # Fetch the next base64 string from the

   # output, so the next loop iteration will

   # decode it

   clamped = decoded[11:-3]

Result of the 63rd iteration of this script.
Figure 7: Result of the 63rd iteration of this script.

After 63 iterations, the script returns actual code, accompanied by an error from the decode function as a stopping condition was never defined. It not clear what the attacker’s motive to perform so many layers of obfuscation was, as one round of obfuscation versus several likely would not make any meaningful difference to bypassing signature analysis. It’s possible this is an attempt to stop analysts or other hackers from reverse engineering the code. However,  it took a matter of minutes to thwart their efforts.

Cryptojacking 2.0?

Cleaned up version of the de-obfuscated code.
Figure 8: Cleaned up version of the de-obfuscated code.

The cleaned up code indicates that the malware attempts to set up a connection to teneo[.]pro, which appears to belong to a Web3 startup company.

Teneo appears to be a legitimate company, with Crunchbase reporting that they have raised USD 3 million as part of their seed round [1]. Their service allows users to join a decentralized network, to “make sure their data benefits you” [2]. Practically, their node functions as a distributed social media scraper. In exchange for doing so, users are rewarded with “Teneo Points”, which are a private crypto token.

The malware script simply connects to the websocket and sends keep-alive pings in order to gain more points from Teneo and does not do any actual scraping. Based on the website, most of the rewards are gated behind the number of heartbeats performed, which is likely why this works [2].

Checking out the attacker’s dockerhub profile, this sort of attack seems to be their modus operandi. The most recent container runs an instance of the nexus network client, which is a project to perform distributed zero-knowledge compute tasks in exchange for cryptocurrency.

Typically, traditional cryptojacking attacks rely on using XMRig to directly mine cryptocurrency, however as XMRig is highly detected, attackers are shifting to alternative methods of generating crypto. Whether this is more profitable remains to be seen. There is not currently an easy way to determine the earnings of the attackers due to the more “closed” nature of the private tokens. Translating a user ID to a wallet address does not appear to be possible, and there is limited public information about the tokens themselves. For example, the Teneo token is listed as “preview only” on CoinGecko, with no price information available.

Conclusion

This blog explores an example of Python obfuscation and how to unravel it. Obfuscation remains a ubiquitous technique employed by the majority of malware to aid in detection/defense evasion and being able to de-obfuscate code is an important skill for analysts to possess.

We have also seen this new avenue of cryptominers being deployed, demonstrating that attackers’ techniques are still evolving - even tried and tested fields. The illegitimate use of legitimate tools to obtain rewards is an increasingly common vector. For example,  as has been previously documented, 9hits has been used maliciously to earn rewards for the attack in a similar fashion.

Docker remains a highly targeted service, and system administrators need to take steps to ensure it is secure. In general, Docker should never be exposed to the wider internet unless absolutely necessary, and if it is necessary both authentication and firewalling should be employed to ensure only authorized users are able to access the service. Attacks happen every minute, and even leaving the service open for a short period of time may result in a serious compromise.

References

1. https://www.crunchbase.com/funding_round/teneo-protocol-seed--a8ff2ad4

2. https://teneo.pro/

Continue reading
About the author
Nate Bill
Threat Researcher
Your data. Our AI.
Elevate your network security with Darktrace AI