ブログ
/
AI
/
April 16, 2025

Force Multiply Your Security Team with Agentic AI: How the Industry’s Only True Cyber AI Analyst™ Saves Time and Stop Threats

See how Darktrace Cyber AI Analyst™, an agentic AI virtual analyst, cuts through alert noise, accelerates threat response, and strengthens your security team — all without adding headcount.
Inside the SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
Written by
Ed Metcalf
Senior Director of Product Marketing, AI & Innovation Products
Default blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog image
16
Apr 2025

With 90million investigations in 2024 alone, Darktrace Cyber AI Analyst TM is transforming security operations with AI and has added up to 30 Full Time Security Analysts to almost 10,000 security teams.

In today’s high-stakes threat landscape, security teams are overwhelmed — stretched thin by burnout, alert fatigue, and a constant barrage of fast-moving attacks. As traditional tools can’t keep up, many are turning to AI to solve these challenges. But not all AI is created equal, and no single type of AI can perform all the functions necessary to effectively streamline security operations, safeguard your organization and rapidly respond to threats.

Thus, a multi-layered AI approach is critical to enhance threat detection, investigation, and response and augment security teams. By leveraging multiple AI methods, such as machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing, security systems become more adaptive and resilient, capable of identifying and mitigating complex cyber threats in real time. This comprehensive approach ensures that no single AI method's limitations compromise the overall security posture, providing a robust defense against evolving threats.

As leaders in AI in cybersecurity, Darktrace has been utilizing a multi-layered AI approach for years, strategically combining and layering a range of AI techniques to provide better security outcomes. One key component of this is our Cyber AI Analyst – a sophisticated agentic AI system that avoids the pitfalls of generative AI. This approach ensures expeditious and scalable investigation and analysis, accurate threat detection and rapid automated response, empowering security teams to stay ahead of today's sophisticated cyber threats.

In this blog we will explore:

  • What agentic AI is and why security teams are adopting it to deliver a set of critical functions needed in cybersecurity
  • How Darktrace’s Cyber AI AnalystTM is a sophisticated agentic AI system that uses a multi-layered AI approach to achieve better security outcomes and enhance SOC analysts
  • Introduce two new innovative machine learning models that further augment Cyber AI Analyst’s investigation and evaluation capabilities

The rise of agentic AI

To combat the overwhelming volume of alerts, the shortage of security professionals, and burnout, security teams need AI that can perform complex tasks without human intervention, also known as agentic AI. The ability of these systems to act autonomously can significantly improve efficiency and effectiveness. However, many attempts to implement agentic AI rely on generative AI, which has notable drawbacks.

Broadly speaking, agentic AI refers to artificial intelligence systems that act autonomously as "agents," capable of carrying out complex tasks, making decisions, and interacting with tools or external systems with no or limited human intervention. Unlike traditional AI models that perform predefined tasks, it uses advanced techniques to mimic human decision-making processes, dynamically adapting to new challenges and responding to varied inputs. In a narrower definition, agentic AI often uses generative large language models (LLMs) as its core, using this to plan tasks and interactions with other systems, iteratively feeding its output into its input to accomplish more tasks than are traditionally possible with a single prompt. When described in terms of technology rather than functionality, agentic AI would be deemed as AI using this kind of generative system.

In cybersecurity, agentic AI systems can be used to autonomously monitor traffic, identify unusual patterns or anomalies indicating potential threats, and take action to respond to these possible attacks. For example, they can handle incident response tasks such as isolating affected systems or patching vulnerabilities, and triaging alerts. This reduces the reliance on human analysts for routine tasks, allowing them to focus on high-priority incidents and strategic initiatives, thereby increasing the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the SOC.

Despite their potential, agentic AI systems with a generative AI core have notable limitations. Whether based on widely used foundation models or fully custom proprietary implementations, generative AI often struggles with poor reasoning and can produce incorrect conclusions. These models are prone to "hallucinations," where they generate false information, which can be magnified through iterative processes. Additionally, generative AI systems are particularly susceptible to inheriting biases from training data, leading to incorrect outcomes, and are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, such as prompt injection that manipulates the AI's decision-making process.

Thus, choosing the right agentic AI system is crucial for security teams to ensure accurate threat detection, streamline investigations, and minimize false positives. It's essential to look beyond generative AI-based systems, which can lead to false positives and missed threats, and adopt AI that integrates multiple techniques. By considering AI systems that leverage a variety of advanced methods, organizations can build a more robust and comprehensive security strategy.  

Industry’s most experienced agentic AI analyst

First introduced in 2019, Darktrace Cyber AI AnalystTM emerged as a groundbreaking, patented solution in the cybersecurity landscape. As the most experienced AI Analyst deployed to almost 10,000 customers worldwide, Cyber AI Analyst is a sophisticated example of agentic AI, aligning closely with our broad definition. Unlike generative AI-based systems, it uses a multi-layered AI approach - strategically combining and layering various AI techniques, both in parallel and sequentially – to autonomously investigate and triage alerts with speed and precision that outpaces human teams. By utilizing a diverse set of AI methods, including unsupervised machine learning, models trained on expert cyber analysts, and custom security-specific large language models, Cyber AI Analyst mirrors human investigative processes by questioning data, testing hypotheses, and reaching conclusions at machine speed and scale. It integrates data from various sources – including network, cloud, email, OT and even third-party alerts – to identify threats and execute appropriate responses without human input, ensuring accurate and reliable decision-making.

With its ability to learn and adapt using Darktrace's unique understanding of an organization’s environment, Cyber AI Analyst highlights anomalies and passes only the most relevant activity to human users. Every investigation is thoroughly explained with natural language summaries, providing transparent and interpretable AI insights. Unlike generative AI-based agentic systems, Cyber AI Analyst's outputs are based on a comprehensive understanding of the underlying data, avoiding inaccuracies and "hallucinations," thereby dramatically reducing risk of false positives.

90 million investigations. Zero burnout.

Building on six years of innovation since launch, Darktrace's Cyber AI Analyst continues to revolutionize security operations by automating time-consuming tasks and enabling teams to focus on strategic initiatives. In 2024 alone, the sophisticated AI system autonomously conducted 90 million investigations, its analysis and correlation during these investigations resulted in escalating just 3 million incidents for human validation and resulting in fewer than 500,000 incidents deemed critical to the security of the organization. This completely changed the security operations process, providing customers with an ability to investigate every relevant alert as an unprecedented alternative to detection engineering that avoids massive quantities of risk from the traditional approach.  Cyber AI Analyst performed the equivalent of 42 million hours of human investigation for relevant security alerts.

The benefits of Cyber AI Analyst will transform security operations as we know it today:

  • Autonomously investigates thousands of alerts, distilling them into a few critical incidents — saving security teams thousands of hours and removing risk from current “triage few” processes. [See how the State of Oklahoma gained 2,561 hours of investigation time and eliminated 3,142 alerts in 3 months]
  • It decreases critical incident discoverability from hours to minutes, enabling security teams to respond faster to potential threats that will severely impact their organization. Learn how South Coast Water District went from hours to minutes in incident discovery.
  • It reduces false positives by 90%, giving security teams confidence in its accuracy and output.
  • Delivers the output of up to 30 full-time analysts – without the cost, burnout, or ramp-up time, while elevating existing human security analysts to validation and response

Cyber AI Analyst allows security teams to allocate their resources more effectively, focusing on genuine threats rather than sifting through noise. This not only enhances productivity but also ensures that critical alerts are addressed promptly, minimizing potential damage and improving overall cyber resilience.

Always innovating - Next-generation AI models for cybersecurity

As empowering defenders with AI has never been more critical, Darktrace remains committed to driving innovation that helps our customers proactively reduce risk, strengthen their security posture, and uplift their teams. To further enhance security teams, Darktrace is introducing two next-generation AI models for cybersecurity within Cyber AI Analyst, including:

  • Darktrace Incident Graph Evaluation for Security Threats (DIGEST): Using graph neural networks, this model analyzes how attacks progress to predict which threats are likely to escalate — giving your team earlier warnings and sharper prioritization.  This means earlier warnings, better prioritization, and fewer surprises during active threats.
  • Darktrace Embedding Model for Investigation of Security Threats - Version 2 (DEMIST-2): This new language model is purpose-built for cybersecurity. With deep contextual understanding, it automates critical human-like analysis— like assessing hostnames, file sensitivity, and tracking users across environments. Unlike large general-purpose models, it delivers superior performance with a smaller footprint. Working across all our deployment types, including on-prem and cloud, it can run without internet access, keeping inference local.

Unlike the foundational LLMs that power many generative and agentic systems, these models are purpose-built for cybersecurity, supported by insights of over 200 security analysts and is capable of mimicking how an analyst thinks, to bring AI-based precision and depth of analysis into the SOC. By understanding how attacks evolve and predicting which threats are most likely to escalate, these machine learning models enable Cyber AI AnalystTM to provide earlier detection, sharper prioritization, and faster, more confident decision-making.

Conclusion

Darktrace Cyber AI AnalystTM redefines security operations with proven agentic AI — delivering autonomous investigations and faster response times, while significantly reducing false positives. With powerful new models like DIGEST and DEMIST-2, it empowers security teams to prioritize what matters, cut through noise, and stay ahead of evolving threats — all without additional headcount. As cyber risk grows, Cyber AI Analyst stands out as a force multiplier, driving efficiency, resilience, and confidence in every SOC.

[related-resource]

Additional resources

Learn more about Cyber AI Analyst

Explore the solution brief, learn how Cyber AI Analyst combines advanced AI techniques to deliver faster, more effective security outcomes

Inside the SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
Written by
Ed Metcalf
Senior Director of Product Marketing, AI & Innovation Products

More in this series

No items found.

Blog

/

Network

/

April 21, 2026

How a Compromised eScan Update Enabled Multi‑Stage Malware and Blockchain C2

Default blog imageDefault blog image

The rise of supply chain attacks

In recent years, the abuse of trusted software has become increasingly common, with supply chain compromises emerging as one of the fastest growing vectors for cyber intrusions. As highlighted in Darktrace’s Annual Threat Report 2026, attackers and state-actors continue to find significant value in gaining access to networks through compromised trusted links, third-party tools, or legitimate software. In January 2026, a supply chain compromise affecting MicroWorld Technologies’ eScan antivirus product was reported, with malicious updates distributed to customers through the legitimate update infrastructure. This, in turn, resulted in a multi‑stage loader malware being deployed on compromised devices [1][2].

An overview of eScan exploitation

According to eScan’s official threat advisory, unauthorized access to a regional update server resulted in an “incorrect file placed in the update distribution path” [3]. Customers associated with the affected update servers who downloaded the update during a two-hour window on January 20 were impacted, with affected Windows devices subsequently have experiencing various errors related to update functions and notifications [3].

While eScan did not specify which regional update servers were affected by the malicious update, all impacted Darktrace customer environments were located in the Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) region.

External research reported that a malicious 32-bit executable file , “Reload.exe”, was first installed on affected devices, which then dropped the 64-bit downloader, “CONSCTLX.exe”. This downloader establishes persistence by creating scheduled tasks such as “CorelDefrag”, which are responsible for executing PowerShell scripts. Subsequently, it evades detection by tampering with the Windows HOSTS file and eScan registry to prevent future remote updates intended for remediation. Additional payloads are then downloaded from its command-and-control (C2) server [1].

Darktrace’s coverage of eScan exploitation

Initial Access and Blockchain as multi-distributed C2 Infrastructure

On January 20, the same day as the aforementioned two‑hour exploit window, Darktrace observed multiple devices across affected networks downloading .dlz package files from eScan update servers, followed by connections to an anomalous endpoint, vhs.delrosal[.]net, which belongs to the attackers’ C2 infrastructure.

The endpoint contained a self‑signed SSL certificate with the string “O=Internet Widgits Pty Ltd, ST=SomeState, C=AU”, a default placeholder commonly used in SSL/TLS certificates for testing and development environments, as well as in malicious C2 infrastructure [4].

Utilizing a multi‑distributed C2 infrastructure, the attackers also leveraged domains linked with the Solana open‑source blockchain for C2 purposes, namely “.sol”. These domains were human‑readable names that act as aliases for cryptocurrency wallet addresses. As browsers do not natively resolve .sol domains, the Solana Naming System (formerly known as Bonfida, an independent contributor within the Solana ecosystem) provides a proxy service, through endpoints such as sol-domain[.]org, to enable browser access.

Darktrace observed devices connecting to blackice.sol-domain[.]org, indicating that attackers were likely using this proxy to reach a .sol domain for C2 activity. Given this behavior, it is likely that the attackers leveraged .sol domains as a dead drop resolver, a C2 technique in which threat actors host information on a public and legitimate service, such as a blockchain. Additional proxy resolver endpoints, such as sns-resolver.bonfida.workers[.]dev, were also observed.

Solana transactions are transparent, allowing all activity to be viewed publicly. When Darktrace analysts examined the transactions associated with blackice[.]sol, they observed that the earliest records dated November 7, 2025, which coincides with the creation date of the known C2 endpoint vhs[.]delrosal[.]net as shown in WHOIS Lookup information [4][5].

WHOIS Look records of the C2 endpoint vhs[.]delrosal[.]net.
Figure 1: WHOIS Look records of the C2 endpoint vhs[.]delrosal[.]net.
 Earliest observed transaction record for blackice[.]sol on public ledgers.
Figure 2: Earliest observed transaction record for blackice[.]sol on public ledgers.

Subsequent instructions found within the transactions contained strings such as “CNAME= vhs[.]delrosal[.]net”, indicating attempts to direct the device toward the malicious endpoint. A more recent transaction recorded on January 28 included strings such as “hxxps://96.9.125[.]243/i;code=302”, suggesting an effort to change C2 endpoints. Darktrace observed multiple alerts triggered for these endpoints across affected devices.

Similar blockchain‑related endpoints, such as “tumama.hns[.]to”, were also observed in C2 activities. The hns[.]to service allows web browsers to access websites registered on Handshake, a decentralized blockchain‑based framework designed to replace centralized authorities and domain registries for top‑level domains. This shift toward decentralized, blockchain‑based infrastructure likely reflects increased efforts by attackers to evade detection.

In outgoing connections to these malicious endpoints across affected networks, Darktrace / NETWORK recognized that the activity was 100% rare and anomalous for both the devices and the wider networks, likely indicative of malicious beaconing, regardless of the underlying trusted infrastructure. In addition to generating multiple model alerts to capture this malicious activity across affected networks, Darktrace’s Cyber AI Analyst was able to compile these separate events into broader incidents that summarized the entire attack chain, allowing customers’ security teams to investigate and remediate more efficiently. Moreover, in customer environments where Darktrace’s Autonomous Response capability was enabled, Darktrace took swift action to contain the attack by blocking beaconing connections to the malicious endpoints, even when those endpoints were associated with seemingly trustworthy services.

Conclusion

Attacks targeting trusted relationships continue to be a popular strategy among threat actors. Activities linked to trusted or widely deployed software are often unintentionally whitelisted by existing security solutions and gateways. Darktrace observed multiple devices becoming impacted within a very short period, likely because tools such as antivirus software are typically mass‑deployed across numerous endpoints. As a result, a single compromised delivery mechanism can greatly expand the attack surface.

Attackers are also becoming increasingly creative in developing resilient C2 infrastructure and exploiting legitimate services to evade detection. Defenders are therefore encouraged to closely monitor anomalous connections and file downloads. Darktrace’s ability to detect unusual activity amidst ever‑changing tactics and indicators of compromise (IoCs) helps organizations maintain a proactive and resilient defense posture against emerging threats.

Credit to Joanna Ng (Associate Principal Cybersecurity Analyst) and Min Kim (Associate Principal Cybersecurity Analyst) and Tara Gould (Malware Researcher Lead)

Edited by Ryan Traill (Content Manager)

Appendices

Darktrace Model Detections

  • Anomalous File::Zip or Gzip from Rare External Location
  • Anomalous Connection / Suspicious Self-Signed SSL
  • Anomalous Connection / Rare External SSL Self-Signed
  • Anomalous Connection / Suspicious Expired SSL
  • Anomalous Server Activity / Anomalous External Activity from Critical Network Device

List of Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)

  • vhs[.]delrosal[.]net – C2 server
  • tumama[.]hns[.]to – C2 server
  • blackice.sol-domain[.]org – C2 server
  • 96.9.125[.]243 – C2 Server

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

  • T1071.001 - Command and Control: Web Protocols
  • T1588.001 - Resource Development
  • T1102.001 - Web Service: Dead Drop Resolver
  • T1195 – Supple Chain Compromise

References

[1] https://www.morphisec.com/blog/critical-escan-threat-bulletin/

[2] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/escan-confirms-update-server-breached-to-push-malicious-update/

[3] hxxps://download1.mwti.net/documents/Advisory/eScan_Security_Advisory_2026[.]pdf

[4] https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/delrosal.net

[5] hxxps://explorer.solana[.]com/address/2wFAbYHNw4ewBHBJzmDgDhCXYoFjJnpbdmeWjZvevaVv

Continue reading
About the author
Joanna Ng
Associate Principal Analyst

Blog

/

Network

/

April 17, 2026

中国系サイバー作戦の進化 - それはサイバーリスクおよびレジリエンスにとって何を意味するか

Default blog imageDefault blog image

サイバーセキュリティにおいては、これまではインシデント、侵害、キャンペーン、そして脅威グループを中心にリスクを整理してきました。これらの要素は現在も重要です -しかし個別のインシデントにとらわれていては、エコシステム全体の形成を見逃してしまう危険があります。国家が支援する攻撃者グループは、個別の攻撃を実行したり短期的な目標を達成したりするためだけではなく、サイバー作戦を長期的な戦略上の影響力を構築するために使用するようになっています。  

当社の最新の調査レポート、Crimson Echoにおいてもこうした状況にあわせて視点を変えています。キャンペーンやマルウェアファミリー、あるいはアクターのラベルを個別のイベントとして分類するのではなく、ダークトレースの脅威調査チームは中国系グループのアクティビティを長期的に連続した行動として分析しました。このように視野を拡大することで、これらの攻撃者がさまざまな環境内でどのように存在しているか、すなわち、静かに、辛抱強く、持続的に、そして多くのケースにおいて識別可能な「インシデント」が発生するかなり前から下準備をしている様子が明らかになりました。  

中国系サイバー脅威のこれまでの変化

中国系サイバーアクティビティは過去20年間において4つのフェーズで進化してきたと言えます。初期の、ボリュームを重視したオペレーションは1990年代にから2000年代初めに見られ、それが2010年代にはより構造化された、戦略に沿った活動となり、そして現在の高度な適応性を備えた、アイデンティティを中心とした侵入へと進化しています。  

現在のフェーズの特徴は、大規模、攻撃の自制、そして永続化です。攻撃者はアクセスを確立し、その戦略的価値を評価し、維持します。これはより全体的な変化を反映したものです。つまりサイバー作戦は長期的な経済的および地政学的戦略に組み込まれる傾向が強まっているということです。デジタル環境へのアクセス、特に国家の重要インフラやサプライチェーン、先端テクノロジーにつながるものは、ある種の長期的な戦略的影響力と見られるようになりました。  

複雑な問題に対するダークトレースのビヘイビア分析アプローチ

国家が支援するサイバーアクティビティを分析する際、難しい問題の1つはアトリビューションです。従来のアプローチは多くの場合、特定の脅威グループ、マルウェアファミリー、あるいはインフラに判定を依存していました。しかしこれらは絶えず変化するものであり、さらに中国系オペレーションの場合、しばしば重複が見られます。

Crimson Echo は2022年7月から2025年9月の間の3年間にDarktrace運用環境で観測された異常なアクティビティを回顧的に分析した結果です。ビヘイビア検知、脅威ハンティング、オープンソースインテリジェンス、および構造化されたアトリビューションフレームワーク(Darktrace Cybersecurity Attribution Framework)を用いて、数十件の中~高確度の事例を特定し、繰り返し発生しているオペレーションのパターンを分析しました。  

この長期的視野を持ったビヘイビア中心型アプローチにより、ダークトレースは侵入がどのように展開していくかについての一定のパターンを特定することができ、動作のパターンが重要であることがあらためて確認されました。  

データが示していること

分析からいくつかの明確な傾向が浮かび上がりました:

  • 標的は戦略的に重要なセクターに集中していたのです。データセット全体で、侵入の88%は重要インフラと分類される、輸送、重要製造業、政府、医療、ITサービスを含む組織で発生しています。   
  • 戦略的に重要な西側経済圏が主な焦点です。米国だけで、観測されたケースの22.5%を占めており、ドイツ、イタリア、スペイン、および英国を含めた主要なヨーロッパの経済圏と合わせると侵入の半数以上(55%)がこれらの地域に集中しています。  
  • 侵入の63%近くがインターネットに接続されたシステムのエクスプロイトから始まっており、外部に露出したインフラの持続的リスクがあらためて浮き彫りになりました。  

サイバー作戦の2つのモデル

データセット全体で、中国系のアクティビティは2つの作戦モデルに従っていることが確認されました。  

1つ目は“スマッシュアンドグラブ”(強奪)型と表現することができます。これらはスピードのために最適化された短期型の侵入です。攻撃者はすばやく動き  – しばしば48時間以内にデータを抜き出し  – ステルス性よりも規模を重視します。これらの侵害の期間の中央値は10日ほどです。検知の危険を冒しても短期的利益を得ようとしていることが明らかです。  

2つ目は“ローアンドスロー”(低速)型です。これらのオペレーションはデータセット内ではあまり多くありませんでしたが、潜在的影響はより重大です。ここでは攻撃者は持続性を重視し、アイデンティティシステムや正規の管理ツールを通じて永続的なアクセスを確立し、数か月間、場合によっては数年にわたって検知されないままアクセスを維持しようとします。1つの注目すべきケースでは、脅威アクターは環境に完全に侵入して永続性を確立し、600日以上経ってからようやく再浮上した例もありました。このようなオペレーションの一時停止は侵入の深さと脅威アクターの長期的な戦略的意図の両方を表しています。このことはサイバーアクセスが長期にわたって保有し活用するべき戦略的資産であることを示しており、これは最も戦略的に重要なセクターにおいて最もよく見られたパターンです。  

同じ作戦エコシステムにおいて両方のモデルを並行して利用し、標的の価値、緊急性、意図するアクセスに基づいて適切なモデルを選択することも可能だという点に注意することも重要です。“スマッシュアンドグラブ” モデルが見られたからといって諜報活動が失敗したとのみ解釈すべきではなく、むしろ目標に沿った作戦上の選択かもしれないと見るべきでしょう。“ローアンドスロー” 型は粘り強い活動のために最適化され、“スマッシュアンドグラブ” 型はスピードのために最適化されています。どちらも意図的な作戦上の選択と見られ、必ずしも能力を表していません。  

サイバーリスクを再考する

多くの組織にとって、サイバーリスクはいまだに一連の個別のイベントとして位置づけられています。何かが発生し、検知され、封じ込められ、組織はそれを乗り越えて前に進みます。しかし永続的アクセスは、特にクラウド、アイデンティティベースのSaaSやエージェント型システム、そして複雑なサプライチェーンネットワークが相互接続された環境では、重大な持続的露出リスクを作り出します。システムの中断やデータの流出が発生していなくても、そのアクセスによって業務や依存関係、そして戦略的意思決定についての情報を得られるかもしれません。サイバーリスクはますます長期的な競合情報収集に似てきています。

その影響はSOCだけの問題ではありません。組織はガバナンス、可視性、レジリエンスについての考え方を見直し、サイバー露出をインシデント対応の問題ではなく構造的なビジネスリスクとして扱う必要があります。  

次の目標

この調査の目的は、これらの脅威の仕組みについてより明確な理解を提供することにより、防御者がより早期にこれらを識別しより効果的に対応できるようにすることです。これには、インジケーターの追跡からビヘイビアの理解にシフトすること、アイデンティティプロバイダーを重要インフラリスクとして扱うこと、サプライヤーの監視を拡大すること、迅速な封じ込めのための能力に投資すること、などが含まれます。  

ダークトレースの最新調査、”Crimson Echo: ビヘイビア分析を通じて中国系サイバー諜報技術を理解する” についてより詳しく知るには、ビジネスリーダー、CISO、SOCアナリストに向けたCrimson Echoレポートのエグゼクティブサマリーを ここからダウンロードしてください。 

Continue reading
About the author
Nathaniel Jones
VP, Security & AI Strategy, Field CISO
あなたのデータ × DarktraceのAI
唯一無二のDarktrace AIで、ネットワークセキュリティを次の次元へ